Talk:Hamburg Süd

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Germany: Hamburg Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Hamburg task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the |unref= from this template.

I have tagged the footnote concerning the 1871 "error". It may be true that at that time the convention for combining schiff and fahrt would have produced schiffahrt (except when hyphenated over a line-end as schiff-fahrt). But the failed German orthography reform of 1944 had apparently intended to remove the third "f", so perhaps it was common before that. I cannot make out what, if anything, was relevant to this in the 1901 reforms. All very confusing, at least to me - though at least since 1996 it has undoubtedly been OK. Davidships (talk) 17:09, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hamburg Süd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161201215203/http://www.hamburgsud.com/group/en/corporatehome/pressmedia/pressreleases/pressreleasedetails_855416.html to http://www.hamburgsud.com/group/en/corporatehome/pressmedia/pressreleases/pressreleasedetails_855416.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]