Talk:HeLa

Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Philosophy: Ethics / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics Contemporary philosophy

Viruses Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Evolutionary biology Low‑importance
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Biology Top‑importance
HeLa is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Top‑importance

This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 October 2021 and 15 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tespat.

Above undated message substituted from

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 January 2020 and 14 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sebawmm24, Angela432. Peer reviewers: Jc181maple, A.Hausker.

Above undated message substituted from

is the kariotype stable or not? 2 opposing citations: 1) "Researchers have also noted how stable these aberrant karyotypes can be" 2) "the notorious instability of HeLa's karyotype" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.216.121.9 (talk) 17:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The lead says the cells "were taken without her knowledge or consent by researcher George Gey...", which I don't think is accurate. I believe that the cells were taken from her tumor by the surgical team that operated on her, not Dr. Gey, and the samples afterwards given to Dr. Gey, who was the researcher doing work at Johns Hopkins. The wording seems to imply the he himself took the samples from her, possibly even surreptitiously.

Later in the Origin section, it says the "cells were propagated by" Dr. Gey, which is more correct, but still leaves the actual origin rather vague.

I think the lead paragraph should be corrected to be more clear about this. Or if that would make the lead too long, put more detailed info in the Origin section. T bonham (talk) 04:08, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've verified it on ^[1] and shall correct it. Thanks, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 11:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"it is estimated that HeLa cells, at one point, contaminated millions of dollars worth of biological research."

Can we rewrite this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.158.66.191 (talk) 00:51, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HeLa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.sivb.org/publicPolicy_Eradication.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040814160109/http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=3426 to http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=3426

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A recent series of edits changed the long-standing date format of this article from Month Day(date), Year to Day(date) Month, Year, so from February 14, 2018 to 14 February, 2018. This would seem to be against the

The article says that HeLa is pronounced /ˈheɪlɑː/, but I've always only heard it as /ˈhiːlɑː/. Looking through the edits, it seems like it used to be /ˈhiːlɑː/ but was changed at some point without a source. Does anyone have a source for this or can anyone confirm one of these pronunciations? Kalexchu (talk) 03:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have never heard it pronounced as anything other than HEEluh (or something close to that). I think the IP was apparently trying to be oh-so-funny & clever, saying that the pronunciation was "HEYLah" - like the "Hey ya" song by Andre3000. I've changed it back to the correct pronunciation, thanks for catching the problem. Shearonink (talk) 03:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm a student editor at JHU editing this article for a final project. My partner and I made some changes to the article shown on Wikipedia. To save time, I'll detail some of the things we've changed so far: shortened the intro, added a controversy section to reflect the bioethical issue produced by HeLa, reorganized the use in research section by field. I also plan to reorganize the photos in the article to be more spread out (specifically the ones at the bottom of the article) to get a better image distribution. Thanks for your time! Sebawmm24 (talk) 01:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]