Talk:Hittitology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconLists Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconArchaeology Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I do not understand the criteria used to decide who the notable Hittitologists are... it looks like a short chaotic list which includes almost only the ones from the States and Germany, and not even all of them nor the most important ones... I see Güterbock , but I do not see Theo van den Hout; I see Miller, who is still a young, though extremely good, scholar, and there's no sign of Wilhelm, Carruba, Hawkins...

Fgiusfredi (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List?

Since this article seems to be just a list of people, it should probably be renamed to List of Hittitologists or List of Hittite scholarsGhostInTheMachine talk to me 18:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]