Talk:Hot House Entertainment
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 October 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Sources press release
The entire history section is taken verbatim from their website (http://press.hothouse.com/company_info.php) and should be rewritten for neutrality. Most of the references point to various sections of their website, and the online properties section reads like a navigation menu. I deleted the most egregious entries but the remaining ones could stand a rewrite as well. Leliro19 (talk) 06:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Online properties
These should be explained either generally or possibly also specifically, what does it mean and what's the difference between them if any.
Possible sources
Hot House search on xbiz and on Gay Porn Times.
COI and adverts by paid editors
An extensive discussion on COI and adverts in this article can be found at
- Blanket and empty vague insinuations are unproductive. Please demonstrate actual COI content before re-adding. -- Banjeboi 13:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)]
Stubbification
The awards section seems appropriate to include and I think it should be restored (unless there is an argument that they are not legitimate awards?). I didn't look carefully at the rest of what was removed, but I think a description of their movie lines and divisions seems reasonable. I think a trim and tweak was needed, but I'm wonder if it might have been overdone? ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Do we really need adverts like:
Film lines
....
Club Inferno - A gay fisting and fetish brand featuring up and coming new directors.
Pack Attack Video - A mid-priced gay gangbang product line launched in 2005.
- I think not. As far as the awards, if they are referenced in a main stream reliable source, they can be included, but if they are linked to a pay for porn site - no way! Smallbones (talk) 13:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Actually a good article would certainly discuss these - and you're removing content not because it's untrue but simply because you apparently don't approve. I'll look to restoring easily sourced material despite the bad faith accusations and insinuations. -- Banjeboi 01:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)]
- Actually a good article would certainly discuss these - and you're removing content not because it's untrue but simply because you apparently don't approve. I'll look to restoring easily sourced material despite the bad faith accusations and insinuations.
- I think not. As far as the awards, if they are referenced in a main stream reliable source, they can be included, but if they are linked to a pay for porn site - no way! Smallbones (talk) 13:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)