Talk:Howard Unruh

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance). LGBT studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles New Jersey Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Back in 1949 Unruh was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. This was the norm back then with many people who were violent. Today it is unlikely that diagnosis would occur.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borange (talk • contribs) 23:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unruh(e) is German and means riot, trouble. 77.132.55.137 (talk) 07:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, German "Ruhe" is rest, repose, quiet, calm, silence, as in "Ruhe und Ordnung" peace and order; "Unruh" is the opposite. Given the number of people with names like "Butcher" and "Slaughter" who never make the nightly news, the name is ironic. Naaman Brown (talk) 12:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Based upon the standard definition of spree killer, Unruh would not fit. When I removed that label, another editor put it back with a citation to a book by Robert Ressler. I tried to compromise by pointing out with sources that Katherine Ramsland calls it a mass murder and sources noting that he is known historically as the first mass murderer, with mention of Ressler's opposing view. The same editor then returned and edited to read spree killer so it looked like the sources supporting mass murder actually said spree instead and then still included Ressler's spree killer definition as if it were different from what was said earlier.

If multiple reliable sources disagree, I believe we should cite both views. In this case I think the mass murderer one should be listed first because more sources mention it, because Ramsland has degrees that Ressler does not, and because Unruh's main claim to fame as an important early mass murderer doesn't make any sense if he was a spree killer instead. DreamGuy (talk) 22:45, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Howard Unruh not meeting the definition of spree killer? Well, at least Wikipedia defines spree killer as "killings at two or more locations with almost no time break between murders". Now, Unruh killed 13 people in about as many minutes, so we can assume that there was almost no time break between the murders. He also went into several separate buildings, shot people in the street, and others from the street in their homes, which, in my opinion, are more than two locations.

And the following sources comply with me

• Victimology: theories and applications
• Wicked deeds: murder in America
• American Murder: Homicide in the early 20th century
• Crime classification manual
• Delivered from Evil
• Crockett, Art: Spree Killers; Kensington Publishing Corporation, 1991.
• Pantziarka, Pan: Lone wolf: True stories of spree killers; Virgin, 2002.

And to quote the article by Katherine Ramsland

While the FBI manual says that because Unruh moved to different locations, his act was not classified as a mass murder, but other criminologists disagree. His spate of killings was one of the shortest on record, it was a contained neighborhood, and he did not travel in the way that spree killers like Andrew Cunanan or Charles Starkweather did. The manual calls Unruh a spree killer, but there is clearly disagreement on this classification. Since the Crime Classification Manual has not been universally adopted the way the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has been in psychiatry, exactly how to classify Unruh seems unclear. (...)
Given these examples of killers who move around in a fairly tight area, either we need to pinpoint a better distinction between mass and spree killers or develop a new category into which to place those who appear to be not quite in either camp.

The problem here is that many people use mass murderer and spree killer interchangeably, not to forget that the distinction itsself is outright stupid. The whole matter is one big clusterfuck and it can't be expected that anybody will ever bother to resolve it. Is Unruh a mass murderer? You could say so. Is he a spree killer? You could say so. Is Unruh's shooting spree a case of amok? You could say so. Is it a case of "Sudden mass assault by a single individual" (SMASI)? You could say so. Does the English language have a term that exclusively describes that kind of behavior. No, it does not. That's the crux here, and the reason we will have these kinds of discussions on Wikipedia forever, as long as we won't engage in a fundamental discussion about the topic to constitute definite rules which term to use when. (Lord Gøn (talk) 23:38, 23 March 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Re this edit which describes Unruh as "the first single-episode mass murderer in U.S. history". It would be more accurate to say that this was the first single person mass shooting to kill more than ten people in the USA. Gilbert Twigg, who killed nine people in 1903 [2] is almost forgotten today.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 19:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091030182248/http://www.philly.com:80/inquirer/local/nj/20090906__You_never_get_over_it_.html?viewAll=y to http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/nj/20090906__You_never_get_over_it_.html?viewAll=y

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090908000717/http://www.philly.com:80/inquirer/front_page/20090906__You_never_get_over_it_.html to http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/20090906__You_never_get_over_it_.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/florida-survivors-demand-action-gun-control-1.4538726

Somebody added this to the article earlier, but I removed it. The connection is coincidental and trivial in my opinion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is interesting, but it runs into problems with

WP:TRIVIA. It isn't notable enough for a mention here.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

There are many other problems with the Berger article, including his fundamental chronology of events which differs from all other contemporary sources including the account of Unruh, which are not relevant here, but given that much of the information in these sections derived either from this article or from much later sources, the sources I have cited are more reliable and also offer more revealing information about the killings and the background to them. Makercomms (talk) 17:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit: I'm concerned that this is running into problems with

I have added a sentence about this. It seems fitting. The Smithsonian profile on Unruh begins with the failure of a gay lover to keep a date and this being the trigger for the shooting. There is probably more material to be added here; a couple of the victims had apparently been aware of Unruh's homosexuality, and he seemed paranoid others were as well. I am surprised this was not in the Wiki entry. [1]

It has been suggested that Unruh's homosexuality was a factor, but there is an element of media speculation. Nobody really knows what tipped Unruh over the edge, and his mental health had been poor for some time, as with many mass shooters. He had all sorts of perceived grudges with other people and the incident with the gate is often given as the trigger for the shooting. The article should be cautious about stating or implying that his homosexuality and the failed date was the motive because of the element of speculation.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 05:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there bracketed info about some of the involved policemen? What purpose does this serve? ElleBlair (talk) 19:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One passage reads as follows:

"Approaching a bread-delivery truck, Unruh shoved his pistol through the door and shot at the driver. He missed his shot by a few inches and the driver unsuccessfully attempted to warn residents."

A later sentence says:

"Zegrino would be the only one of Unruh's intended targets to survive the rampage."

But that is contradicted by the first passage.