Talk:I don't know her

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Former featured article candidateI don't know her is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleI don't know her has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 11, 2023Good article nomineeListed
December 20, 2023Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 27, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Mariah Carey does not know Jennifer Lopez?
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 19:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Mariah Carey does not know Jennifer Lopez? Source: CNN "Years ago, Mariah Carey was asked during an interview about fellow singer/actress Jennifer Lopez. Carey shook her head and proclaimed, 'I don’t know her.'" In 2016, "[Carey] insisted that while she and Lopez may have crossed paths, she does not 'know' her."
    • Reviewed: [[]]

Created by Heartfox (talk). Self-nominated at 16:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/I don't know her; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • @Heartfox: Not a review, but I have to say this article feels very one-sided in favor of Carey—with Lopez not quoted even once. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a hit piece, but it feels weird not to mention her side of the story. Did she have anything to say about the rivalry or the meme, or has she maintained radio silence over it? Even if it's the latter, I think that bears mentioning in the article. DigitalIceAge (talk) 03:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for the comments. It was not my intention to make it seem one-sided at all, and I don't think it is. The article mentions that the rivalry was formed by the media, and gives two sides of interpreting the phrase. Lopez is not singled out for her specific actions in any way. It is more about Carey's former record label and ex-husband's alleged actions, and Lopez was caught in the middle. I do understand your point of view and I will incorporate more context later today when I have more time. Heartfox (talk) 13:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • No problem. It's an interesting and well-cited article with a strong DYK hook otherwise, and I appreciate the commitment to adding balance. DigitalIceAge (talk) 17:05, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Heartfox: Image licensing good: 2 free and one that follows NFCC. Article new enough (published from draft) and long enough. Hook is good and cited inline. Article is well sourced, neutral, no BLP violations, and no copyvio detected (though I would advise you to cut down on your usage of quotes even further for your GA nom; take a look at WP:Copyediting reception sections). Nominator's second nomination for DYK so no QPQ needed. Looks good! ~ F4U (talkthey/it) 14:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:I don't know her/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:

talk · contribs) 14:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (
    lists
    )
    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (
    reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism
    ):
    Formatting is ok for GA standards. All the newspapers and music and entertainment magazines used are reliable. Interviews are ok. The journal articles and books come from reliable journals and publishers respectively. Will check the other subcriteria sometime
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

An iconic stan culture staple. more things like this need to be GA! taking for review; ping after a week if I haven't started yet

Will you call me?"
📝 "Will you hang me out to dry?" 14:40, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Will you call me?"
📝 "Will you hang me out to dry?" 04:02, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for the review and helpful comments
Your Power, Heartfox (talk) 21:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Wonderful! All my comments have been addressed. Passing...
Will you call me?"
📝 "Will you hang me out to dry?" 06:58, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Celebrity Gossip

Other than the statement, "I don't know her," which could be included in Mariah Carey's article and a few other things that actually happened, this article turns wikipedia into a gossip column. It should be speedily deleted. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric Wastrel Way (talk) 22:47, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does the article say that is not a fact? Heartfox (talk) 23:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure
Will you call me?"
📝 "Will you hang me out to dry?" 07:22, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Missing 3 relevant information

1. There's a second second called if we that was ripped off together with loverboy.

2. Not only the two songs were ripped off, the concept of sound strategy were too.

3. This maneuver caused Mariah to redo loverboy, redo material, consequently delayed the project, which in turns came to be released on november 11th. 2804:14C:126:809E:6D14:C043:2A89:AA84 (talk) 16:54, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]