Talk:Imperial Klans of America

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
inactive.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

several modern?

This statement looks like original research. Are there any sources for this article? Ste4k 05:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flip to any recent book on the Klan in your local library and you will find all the references you could want. silsor 04:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They need to be cited here for the sake of the article. Ste4k 12:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The IKA is not Conservative

According to the only source listed in this article, "We are not conservatives, as we despise them. A conservative is someone who only seeks to conserve what is left and will usually call a compromise that only slightly weakens us a "victory."" Ste4k 17:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

question

LOL some liberal/ethnic/gay whatever buy k-k-k.com, its for sale! http://www.k-k-k.com/forsale.html

What does the IKA say about liberals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.241.245.245 (talkcontribs)

Well, I suggest checking the external link. You are welcome to help write this article and it would be great if you would create a username for yourself for easy recognition. I haven't had much time to dig into this article yet, and am still participating in prelimary discussion on the the main page. Wikipedia would certainly welcome another new addition. :) Ste4k 17:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Christ!

The Gangland special showed a most confusing and amusing scene: the IKK members solemnly praying to Jesus around their burning cross, next to a burning swastika, culminated with a round of stiff-armed salutes. Yes, they were giving a Jew the Nazi salute. I laughed so hard I was at risk of becoming a fatality of their organization... can anyone explain? Wnt (talk) 07:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soxwon (talk) 03:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
It's a fair question worth answering, citing a source though not a readily available one. You've followed me from an edit war where you suppressed widely sourced information to an article you never edited - do you plan to offer anything but more misinterpretations of policy? Wnt (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
From
Soxwon (talk) 02:27, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

RfC

Light bulb iconBAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:47, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drug arrest of Imperial Wizard

Ron Edwards and his girlfriend were arrested for possession of hydrocodone and methamphetamine. At the same time, another man was arrested for possession of marijuana. That information, however accurate and intentionally defamatory (sourced from the Anti-Defamation League, no less), is not relevant to this article. If you want the information to be included in Wikipedia, create an article about

United States Government, unless you were attempting to create a bias. Nor is there a reference to Marion Barry's 1990 arrest in the article about Washington, D.C.. I'm removing the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.51.31.120 (talk) 12:07, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

As a matter of fact, the sourced material doesn't say ANYTHING about the arrest other than that it happened. The rest is anti-Klan literature. I don't know that such a biased source is even acceptable per

WP:IRS. It is information about a living person, so a greater degree of scrutiny is required, and, again, it is blatantly biased information coming from an opponent of the organization. 174.51.31.120 (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

SPLC references

I have to take additional issue with the SPLC's newsletter being used as a source about the court case's ultimate verdict.

WP:Source.174.51.31.120 (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

There seem to be a couple sources from SPLC. None of them are acceptable. They are all sources from an opponent organization, they are self-serving, are written in an editorial fashion with no evidence to support the authors' claims, and are unverifiable in the mainstream media. In the words of the Daleks: delete, delete, delete. 174.51.31.120 (talk) 14:12, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperial Klans of America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Imperial Klans of America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hal Turner's involvement

It should probably be indicated in the article in a manner consistent with Wikipedia guidelines that it is now known that Hal Turner was working undercover among such racial groups for the FBI in an anti-terror capacity. Going to the article on Hal Turner will confirm this easily, but there is no way to tell that from this article alone.2A00:C1A0:4893:AD00:5D33:A903:314A:8606 (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperial Klans of America. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"NordicFest" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect

NordicFest. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 6#NordicFest until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]