Talk:Imrana rape case

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Uttar Pradesh / Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Uttar Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in April 2012. Islam: Islam and Controversy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force. Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I claim complete ignorance of provinces of India, but Shouldn't the country name be somewhere on here? Or is that a us-centric viewpoint? I will leave it up to the regulars... CodeCarpenter 20:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will do some cleap up. Yes the case was in Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.--nids(♂) 11:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem that there is to be an issue of ongoing vandalism - and some rather naughty Sectarian Mischief to cause offence.

Due to the nature of the Vandalism which is evidently designed to cause offence on religious grounds I do believe that the page should be semi protected permanently to stop further IP edits and premeditated damage. Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk) 10:49, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the revisions based on this being disruptive material. If there is sockpuppetry, this can be raised at Sockpuppet investigations. The request at Requests for page protection has been declined as this was just one attempt; should it become a pattern please request long term protection. --Fæ (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tanks Fæ - I'll keep an eye out! Media-Hound 'D 3rd P^) (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070926232328/http://ncw.nic.in/imrana%20case.pdf to http://ncw.nic.in/imrana%20case.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

]