Talk:Inside Out (2002 TV programme)

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 20:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Inside Out (UK TV series) → Inside Out (2002 TV programme)
• Inside Out (Scottish TV series) → Inside Out (2000 TV series)
• Inside/Out (TV series) → Inside/Out (U.S. TV series)

– There are multiple issues to unpack here:

1. The first is that there is no provision for "sub-national" disambiguation under
   Inside Out (Scottish TV series) and Inside Out (UK TV series)
   need to be diambiguated from each other "by year" (hatnotes will likely be needed on top of that...).
2. The second is that
   WP:NCTV
   , rather than "series" (which implies "continuing story elements", something that doesn't apply to unscripted news programming).
3. Third, it is questionable that
   WP:SMALLDETAILS is enough to leave Inside/Out (TV series) without additional "by country" disambiguation... Or, at the least, I don't know if it is – I'll let those who comment here help sort this out, as the third move may or may not be necessary... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:48, 9 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:33, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
   ]

• Support - for all the reasons given. Before anyone thinks that "Scottish" is a good option, how do you decide that without that being opinion based? ITV, a British company, owns Scottish Television who produced the series. So by WP:NCTV - which goes by country of broadcast, its "UK". Also, this opens up a huge can of worms for people who would then want to argue that a series is "English" or "N. Ireland" or even "Floridian". To IJBall, I knew we should have solved this issue at the Agenda discussion. I'll just repeat and say that there needs to be a better word for these kind of programs (as I'm sure this won't be the last). --Gonnym (talk) 21:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• The first title (UK) is problematic anyway due to the Scottish one,
  WP:INCDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support per nom. Unreal7 (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

talk page or in a move review

. No further edits should be made to this section.