Talk:Intellipedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Intellipedia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 555 days

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 555 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

The screenshot

The screenshot of the wiki has a link to the Intellipedia for goodness sake! What if someone got into trouble because of that! What if someone copied Top Secret documents from that wiki! Could someone please delete that image because it could place people in danger and someone could risk losing their jobs. 89.241.162.63 (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image is unclassified. Classified Intellipedias cannot be reached from Wikipedia, and vice versa. MatthewBurton (talk) 16:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I see. Sorry for the mistake but it was easy to jump to the wrong answer. I was just thinking what if say some nasty troll tried to get on anyway. Thanks for the answer! 89.241.162.63 (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New source from Wired

Dreyfuss, Emily (March 10, 2017). "The Wikipedia for Spies—And Where It Goes From Here". Wired. Retrieved March 11, 2017.

czar 17:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Intellipedia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up external links —¿philoserf? (talk) 02:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]