Talk:Invisible hand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconPolitics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reverting the inclusion of an image

Hello @2605:a601:555c:b100:75d8:9c7e:f3db:2795:. You have reverted two times the inclusion of an allegorical image. Can you explain why? Thanks. Theklan (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OR tagging

Volunteer Marek you have tagged the article for OR but not explained what the OR is. If you don't give any explanation, then the tagging won't really help. From my perspective this is an article I've started looking at and IMHO the article is mainly just a bunch of notes at the moment, so perhaps whatever you spotted is easily resolved by adding a source, or deleting some words. Eventually though, I think things can only be fully clear when the body is rewritten with more complete sources etc. Andrew Lancaster (talk) 20:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the section on WoN for example. It’s all sourced to the book itself (primary source) with some Wikipedian’s commentary, thoughts, and personal interpretation of it. All this should be based on secondary sources. Volunteer Marek 00:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I don't know if it is best described as OR because as you say someone has at least started with primary sources. I just think the article as a whole as not yet had much attention, but you're right.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 06:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]