Talk:Jenna Lee

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). Journalism Low‑importance Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Softball: College Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Softball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Softball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftballWikipedia:WikiProject SoftballTemplate:WikiProject SoftballSoftball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by College softball task force.

From Esquire portrait on Roger Ailes:

We don't know about you, but Esquire's eye goes to the screen featuring your creamy redhead, Jenna Lee.

Sure, that's a Fox screen, and so you win again. But — if you don't mind our saying so — it didn't exactly require an advanced degree in TV geniusology to see the potential of Ms. Jenna Lee.

Wait — it did? "Well, she didn't look anything like she looks now when she came here. She'd just completed Columbia journalism school, and she wanted to be a writer. But I met with her and sent her down to hair and makeup to clean her up a little. When she came back, I took a look at her and said, 'What would you think of going on air?' I had to work with her a little to bring her pitch down, and now she's going to be a big star. And she wanted to be a writer."

http://www.esquire.com/print-this/roger-ailes-0211?page=all Maybe it can be worked in?

Tariqmudallal (talk) 02:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Having been reverted twice by GauchoDude, I'll bring the matter to the talk page. I'm wondering why he says that the material is unsourced. Is the source listed in the article insufficient in his eyes? (If not, that's still not "unsourced"; it's a separate issue.) 207.161.217.209 (talk) 02:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@207.161.217.209: I apologize for being less than clear with the unsourced information note upon reverting. The reason the infobox information keeps getting reverted is because Template:Marriage, used in the infobox, doesn't support the full date of marriage and shows only the year. Please note that in the Personal Life section of the article, the full date of the marriage with the corresponding source is listed. Hope that clears up any confusion. Thanks, GauchoDude (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GauchoDude: So what did you mean by "unsourced" (a term you used more than once) in that case? And that is incorrect, Template:Marriage does in fact support the full date (which is displayed via tooltip) as is clearly indicated in its documentation. So that doesn't clear anything up, I'm afraid. 207.161.217.209 (talk) 19:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@207.161.217.209: This is news to me, I was unaware of the hover over feature as I had never seen the full date in any of the actual text behind the scenes. I've followed the marriage template and have re-added this information. Thanks for the new tip! GauchoDude (talk) 12:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jenna Lee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304185834/http://www.journalism.columbia.edu/system/documents/491/original/E-News_July_2011.pdf to http://www.journalism.columbia.edu/system/documents/491/original/E-News_July_2011.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/the_ticker/the_ticker_newseum_hunter_lee_130503.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]