Talk:Jim Sheridan (politician)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Scotland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

His bio on his website [1] say he's 52, but this article said he was born

His Labour Party biography has Born 24.11.52, Glasgow. --Cavrdg 19:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting. I've removed it again, though, (the anon is me logged out) as I'm inclined to regard his personal biographical site as more likely to be right. Even some speculation causes contradiction: clearly it is up to date as of at least the 2005 election results, and so he still can't have been born in 1952 even if we suppose his age has not gotten updated there. On the other hand, the Party's website ought to know its stuff from paperwork etc. Until we can be certain of this, it should stay removed. I'll see if I can get an email response from their website, but it'll have to be of the kind that actaully updates the site, since I can't just cite a reply from them (

WP:NOR etc). -Splash - tk 20:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I'd go with the Labour link, politicans only update their websites at election time and aren't actually known for keeping them upto date, so it's very likely his bio is out of date.

Catchpole 21:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

It won't do to speculate in the face of conflicting information from authoritative sources elsewhere, though. It is not for Wikipedia to pronounce on the 'truth' of one version over another, and the media frequently lambasts the project for it. Until the differences are settled (I've emailed the webmaster, in hope) we really cannot include the date of birth here. Note that the BBC has opted to report him as being 52 also. We must not speculate. It is not a critical piece of information in the immediate sense; it can wait re-appearing until we know for sure. -Splash - tk 21:14, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050508214110/http://www.james-sheridan-mp.org.uk:80/news.htm to http://www.james-sheridan-mp.org.uk/news.htm#Resignation_Statement_-_9th_August_2006

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—