This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
I think the similarity to the subject's home page (found by "CorenSearchBot") can be counted as "fair use" in this context. Contents of publication-names surely don't count? Melcombe (talk) 17:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know he had a doctoral advisor? Qwfp (talk) 18:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
At Oxford University, Professor Gittins's homepage lists him as having the higher degree, D. Sci. (Oxford), 1992. The Mathematics Genealogy Project lists his doctoral advisor as "unknown" and lists no year. (British academics often had only M.A. degrees, at least until the Thatcher era, according to Michael Dummett.) Thanks! Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 00:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He no doubt does have a DSci (and not an honorary one), but that doesn't mean he had a doctoral advisor. The award can be just by submission of a selection of publications, as indicated in the artcle D. Sci. that you linked to. No "advisor" or "supervisor" needed. As indicated in the article, the award usually goes to someone with vast experience ... someone who has been working independently for many years. Thus there is a major difference from what a "PhD" usually entails. Melcombe (talk) 09:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
("honorary": I corrected my phrasing, which previously had the ambiguous and usually misleading word "honorary", which I had intended to mean "given later in life, to mark a very productive research career", rather than in the usual sense of "honorary degree". Thanks, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 22:04, 18 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]
