Talk:John Finnemore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Requested move 20 October 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. There is consensus that the living Finnemore is

hundreds 10:58, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]


– There are currently articles at

John Finnemore (author), with a disambiguation at John Finnemore
.

Since July 2015 or article creation, pageviews are as follows:

Which I think demonstrates that

John Finnemore (author) receives about half the page views that the disambiguation page gets. I don't think either can easily be ascribed greater long term significance, but I think the usage differential is sufficient to move the page. Ralbegen (talk) 22:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, and it's clear that most people coming to the encyclopedia are after the living Finnemore. I'm not sure that recentism is something an affliction that's too useful for a page that's primary by usage. Ralbegen (talk) 15:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
To be honest, I'm less bothered about one being primary than I am about the non-existent disambiguation. I don't have an especial problem with the living Finnemore becoming primary topic, but the other one should still be moved to
John Finnemore (writer, born 1863). -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
This proposal is about the living Finnemore being the primary topic by usage. I'd be happy to see the "(author)" disambiguation also changed, though my preference would be for "John Finnemore (born 1863)" as proposed by Qwfp above. Ralbegen (talk) 10:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.