Talk:John Joe Nevin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Total racism

This article is a disgrace. One entire section is nothing but racist drivel directed at the travelling community. Shame on the editors for letting this take place on their watch.213.55.211.49 (talk) 16:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The "Controversy" section seems outsized in its prominence compared to the rest of the article. This is the biography of an Olympic and professional boxer. WheelOfTime22 (talk) 16:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nominated

Article nominated for speedy deletion, as the "Controversy" section has been heavily vandalised. Fact and rumour have been mixed together to a hopeless degree. The risk of libel is enormous. Please clean up the article and remove libelous content before removing the speedy deletion notice. WheelOfTime22 (talk) 17:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Joe Nevin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Joe Nevin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Joe Nevin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy Section

I've removed the controversy section because it did seem outsized, particular in terms of detail, compared to the rest of the article. If anyone want to put it back would they mind commenting here as well when they do, just to understand the reasoning behind it. Red Fiona (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]