Talk:John Lutz (mystery writer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Requested move 14 March 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved.

talk) 08:23, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
]


– Because his the mystery writer's birth year is unverifiable, I removed the birth year, so "John Lutz (writer, born 19xx)" is impossible at this time. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 01:52, 22 March 2015 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. There appear to be two John Lutzes. Thus
    WP:TWODABS applies. No need to disambiguate both articles. The current hatnote gets people to the other John Lutz. Dohn joe (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
But this person is not the primary person of the same name. His significance and popularity doesn't outmatch the other as far as I can see. --George Ho (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any evidence to back up that feeling? Dohn joe (talk) 19:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mystery writer and TV writer. TV writer bio is more viewed than the other. Bing and Google. --George Ho (talk) 19:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok - thanks. That is pretty convincing. If you propose moving the other one to the plain name, I would support both moves. Dohn joe (talk) 20:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed this proposal on your behalf. George Ho (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support amended proposal. Dohn joe (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Who said it was a "feeling"? I said "no primary John Lutz" this indicates that I followed the criteria for primary topic set out in the guideline. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay - would you please explain for the rest of us which criteria you used and how they indicate no primarytopic to you? Dohn joe (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I added the referenced date of birth for the mystery author, but (mystery writer) still seems like a better dab. While the situation is not clear-cut (the mystery writer is prolific, but not as famous), per
    No such user (talk) 11:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Lutz (mystery writer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]