Talk:Josef Joffe

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism Low‑importance

Would an interview with Josef Joffe from 1987 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_6984B787C0BC4119B40981BDC0AB1094 (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In order to avoid BLP violations, I think we need sources that clearly provide context, preferably with some analysis. Otherwise we have nothing that demonstrates this comment by Joffe is any more noteworthy than anything else he has ever said. The sources so far have been poor, where context is specifically removed. That's simply sensationalism that I don't believe has any place in this encyclopedia, let alone in a BLP. --

• Ronz, thanks for your note here. Please see my comments on User talk:Lucasneville: Joffe did not say what these NPOV-violating party hacks are saying. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I have just modified 2 external links on Josef Joffe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080903140719/http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/-berpower-by-joseph-joffe-10087 to http://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/-berpower-by-joseph-joffe-10087
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ehfu.org/scopus-award
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927103819/http://www.hoover.org/bios/joffe to http://www.hoover.org/bios/joffe

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

O.k., today. - But in March, 1944 - ? Amnesia ? --213.172.123.242 (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]