This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has a serious error, in the fact that it considers Alta California and Mexico different entities, although one was part of the other, that is, Alta California was a "state" or "department" inside Mexico, just as today, California is a "state" inside the U.S. The author might have meant Mexico City (where the central government was located) but since no references are provided, there's no sufficient evidence to change all references in that way. It could also be that he used a modern POV (which would not be considered NPOV according to wikipedia standards) and state that the people involved returned to "present-day" Mexico (most probably the states of Baja California or Sonora) to be closer to the central government. 63.97.181.193 (talk) 21:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The myth that there was ever an independent Alta California, beginning with Alvarado's 1836 rebellion, has been perpetuated mainly by one editor, User talk:Wighson. Editors concerned with accurate history should join me in urging Wighson to stop reverting corrections to this page. WCCasey (talk) 19:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, "California Republic" mythology had to be corrected in this article. Please stop with the revisionist pseudo-history. WCCasey (talk) 06:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Photo removed is of same item (taken by museum staff)
I'm just worried about copyright. Perhaps the black-and-white image is copyrighted by the museum as well. But, that one's been around so long, I thought maybe it's status had already been adjudicated. I'm just worried about swiping images from websites and declaring them non-copyrightable. Such behavior gives Wikipedia a black eye. (Especially as this user has had several images deleted off the Wikimedia Commons for similar violations: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hodgdon%27s_secret_garden). TuckerResearch (talk) 14:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]