Talk:K-98 (Kansas highway)

K-98 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 24, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  Kansas   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.   Kansas Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:K-98 (Kansas highway)/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ncchild (talk · contribs) 03:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I gotchu, just give me a little bit until all the I-587 business is sorted out.--Ncchild (talk) 03:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lead

• "and the eastern terminus" would probably be better suited as "and its eastern terminus" but if you think I'm wrong feel free to say so.

I agree  Fixed

• You stylize the first mention of a U.S. route as (US 54) but every instance later is US-54 or US-56. Is that on purpose?

Oops  Fixed

• "the highway travels through flat farmland and a two-lane road its entire length." Some sort of preposition like "it is a two-lane road" seems needed here.

Not sure how to change this?

Route description

• By in large I think it is good. The main comment I have is where it says "the school" in Fowler. It looks like it passes multiple schools, a grade school and high school simultaneously. I was originally going to say it would be nice if it was more specific but at the least I think it needs to be plural.

 Fixed

• "K-98 then reaches its eastern terminus at US 54." No dash in the US-54. Also, an actual or approximate length between the two would be nice.

 Fixed

• "On K-98 in 2020" Not sure that "On K-98" is needed, as you've already established we're talking about K-98.

I think it needs to be added because of the sentence prior, a reader wouldn't know what highway.

History

• Theres a weird ": 12" next to citation 16. Other than that, I don't see anything right away.

The 12 is the page number that has the content in the reference. The reference is multi-paged so it has that so the info can be found quickly.

Major intersections

• No issues.

@420Traveler: Here's my thoughts at first glance, let me know if you have any questions.--Ncchild (talk) 04:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ncchild: HI sorry for delay, I will get to it soon. Just been really busy working. -420Traveler (talk) 11:06, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ncchild: hey, fixed most things and have a few questions on others. Let me know, sorry for long delay. -420Traveler (talk) 18:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@420Traveler: Hey, I'm really sorry about the delay as well, I've been moving and starting law school. Let me look over everything now and I'll get back to you. Ncchild (talk) 15:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@420Traveler I only see one thing, and it's picky so apologies about that. The second, third, and fourth sentences all start with "the" which gets a bit repetitive. If one could be changed (preferably the third sentence) to start a different way, I think it would flow better. Other than that, it looks good to me! Ncchild (talk) 15:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ncchild: No problem, I agree. I think I got the one you mentioned. -420Traveler (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@420Traveler Cool, I'm good with it now, so I'll go ahead and pass it. Ncchild (talk) 16:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]