Talk:Kai Brodersen

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is now almost wholly uncited, if one ignores self-publications which are self-citing but do not confer notability, nor provide evidence for biographical details; there used to be one reference (for a minor role) but this has been removed as, probably, no longer current - something that is quite wrong for an article but perfect for one's own CV, so it's worrying to find that going on here.

The article also consists very largely of CV-like lists of publications, rather than of any kind of properly documented story about the subject of the article.

For a BLP, these are quite serious problems which ought to be addressed reasonably urgently. A radical cutting-down of minor works might be in order; sources for the "life" part of the article are required; and evidence of notability is needed also. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]