Talk:Karen B. Westerfield Tucker
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Karen B. Westerfield Tucker article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that The Oxford History of Christian Worship was appraised by one reviewer as "by far the best example in the English language" of a multiauthored liturgical history? Source: Lathrop, Gordon W. (April 2007). "The Oxford History of Christian Worship: Geoffrey Wainwright and Karen Westerfield Tucker, editors: New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 923 pp. $55.00". Theology Today. 64 (1). Princeton Theological Seminary: 112–114
Created by Pbritti (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 47 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Pbritti (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Based on my review, I think this is good to go once the QPQs are complete. I couldn't think of a more interesting hook, so I feel like this one is interesting enough. Please ping me when the QPQs are ready. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @LEvalyn: I've completed one QPQ with another one pending a reply. I think I could maybe punch out a quick article on Westerfield Tucker this afternoon (nothing fancy, but at least C-class in depth). Would you be willing to review a second short article so that maybe we can get a slightly more interesting hook out of this? ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @LEvalyn: I am going to have to do another couple QPQs, but Karen B. Westerfield Tucker is ready for your review. The alt to reflect this second article is below:
- ALT1: ... that Karen B. Westerfield Tucker, who both edited and wrote contributions for The Oxford History of Christian Worship, also serves as a dog show judge?
- Thanks again for your willingness to take on this additional task! ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @LEvalyn: QPQs done. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Pbritti:Thanks, that new hook is way more interesting! Cool find. I'm assuming your QPQs are Shilshole people, Robert Drinan, Clean (2022 film), and Paul Huff Parkway. My review of Karen B. Westerfield Tucker is below:
- @LEvalyn: QPQs done. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @LEvalyn: I am going to have to do another couple QPQs, but Karen B. Westerfield Tucker is ready for your review. The alt to reflect this second article is below:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |