Talk:Kate Leth

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). Comics: Creators / World Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Related work groups: /  This article is supported by Comics creators work group. This article is supported by World comics work group. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. LGBT studies: Person Start‑class This article is supported by the LGBT Person task force.

This biographical article uses the pronouns she/her/hers. See https://archive.md/n5f9R.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kate Leth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150619001407/http://comicsalliance.com/category/kate-or-die-2/?nav to http://comicsalliance.com/category/kate-or-die-2/?nav

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Her misandry should be included — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheZelos (talk • contribs) 17:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If there are reliable sources criticizing her, sure, but there aren't any I've found as of yet, even from a simple search of "kate leth misandrist" or other similar searches.

Reliable sources are the name of the game on Wikipedia, so they are what determine what is on the main page and other pages. --Historyday01 (talk) 18:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

I have added a sourced controversy section. Please propose improvements. Londondare (talk) 15:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, neither of those sources is a reliable source. The Know Your Meme page is written by a user which says "Banned" next to their name (presumably meaning they were banned from Know Your Meme), so that significantly lowers the reliability. So removing the section. Bounding into Comics has been described by editors

WP:GRAPEVINE, to name two guidelines, reliable sources are needed to add a section like "controversy". Historyday01 (talk) 19:57, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Those tweets themselves are reliable source, aren't they? Would you agree if I provide her tweets are a source of what she said in her tweets? Londondare (talk) 09:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tweets are self-published sources. Stop trying to shoehorn this subject into this page. Historyday01 (talk) 12:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shoehorn? That is just your point of view. How about https://www.centreformalepsychology.com/? Is that source reliable enough? Londondare (talk) 08:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen people try and shoehorn topics like that into various pages, which can get tiresome, sometimes people with a political axe to grind (not saying that is the case in this instance) to do so. I'm fine with being critical of Leth, its just that I haven't seen any reliable sources be critical of her (for better or worse), only chatter on social media (which is not very reliable when it comes to this), comments from those who detest High Guardian Spice, or unreliable sites. Looking at the site you mentioned, their ONLY source about Leth's statements is the Bounding into Comics link, which I already noted is unreliable. In addition, only ONE sentence of that article, which I linked to in the previous sentence, is even about Leth. The rest of the article is about misandry. As I've said before, reliable sources are the name of the game on here and I will continue to say that. Historyday01 (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are doing a good work. Thanks. Londondare (talk) 07:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]