Talk:Kevin Gage (actor)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

STOP removing Verifiable, legally correct information from this Actor's update.

Additional info that is being removed - [redacted]

[ Redacted - No legal threats, per

This policy
]

Wikiblogg - to put this information on Wikipedia you simply must point to some reliable secondary source. A newspaper interview? Kevin Gage's own website? Otherwise, there would be nothing to stop me claiming to know (or even be)
tarts. And please don't start throwing around legal threats. (a) you'll get blocked, which won't help anyone, and (b) your lawyer will laugh. A lot. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Son with Kelly Preston

Why is there no mention of his son with Kelly Preston? 2601:8:9180:604:219:D1FF:FEA8:25F0 (talk) 21:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Such personal information added to
reliable sources. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:33, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kevin Gage (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

name policy, non notable offspring

Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value.

The presumption in favor of privacy is strong in the case of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved, otherwise low-profile persons. The names of any immediate, former, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject.[f] However, names of family members who are not also notable public figures must be removed from an article if they are not properly sourced. Saintstephen000 (talk)