Talk:L. Bruce Archer

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Industrial design Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I only rewrote a couple of sentences, I did move stuff around in the article. Still needs major attention but I've had my fill of Mr. Archer for today. --revotfel ^★ 18:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Passages are identical in this article: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/professor-bruce-archer-491278.html

Not sure which one is the source, but seems to be some plagiarism here (unless I didn't notice the references, which is entirely possible). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.168.76 (talk) 17:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastian Macmillan writes: Having known Bruce reasonably well, I originally wrote an account of his life in support of a presentation to him of a Lifetime Achievement Award of the Design Research Society in 2004. I later expanded this into the obituary in The Independent. Quite a lot of the facts I had set out reappeared in his obituary in The Times by a press writer, and Christopher Frayling published a more personal obituary in the Guardian. Drawing largely on my original but with some additional facts from these other sources, and editing it to differentiate it from The Independent version, I uploaded the first Wikipedia version, naming him as Bruce Archer, only to have it removed within 24 hours on the grounds it plagiarised The Times obituary! Ironic or what. I presumed the bot to be part of the Rupert Murdoch empire, as there was no reference to similarities between the article and The Independent original. Or perhaps the bot just doesn't read The Independent. Anyway, as a work-around, I switched the title to L. Bruce Archer which was how he signed himself for a number of years, and here it has stayed. Revotfel seems to have edited it into a more standardised Wikipedia format, and others have provided references etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.250.77 (talk) 17:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You know, we can't use original material. Everything has to be cited to published

talk) 23:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

I have just modified one external link on L. Bruce Archer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20091014044207/http://www.designresearchsociety.org/joomla/content/view/60/85/ to http://www.designresearchsociety.org/joomla/content/view/60/85/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]