Talk:LGBT pride

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Requested move 30 September 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved, though feel free to submit a

WP:MR (non-admin closure) Invinciblewalnut (talk) 03:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]


Gay prideLGBTQ pride – Pride is about all of LGBTQ, not just gay people. Aalaa324 (talk) 17:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. Havelock Jones (talk) 12:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

@
WP:COMMONNAME? EvergreenFir (talk) 17:25, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

https://prideinlondon.org/ https://www.loc.gov/lgbt-pride-month/about/ https://youth.gov/feature-article/june-lgbt-pride-month https://www.adl.org/education/resources/tools-and-strategies/lgbtq-pride-month-and-education-resources https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/06/01/a-proclamation-on-lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender-and-queer-pride-month-2021/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1553118X.2020.1750017

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Giant criticism section

I get that this is a controversial subject and criticism should be mentioned, but fringe should not be over represented and the main article for gay pride should not be overwhelmed with these fringe views in opposition to it without some balance. overall, the section seems pointless at times and over bearing in detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.27.204.252 (talkcontribs) 05:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which parts/sources do you think are fringe/undue weight? Dronebogus (talk) 13:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 May 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to LGBT pride. This is the most widely agreed upon title. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


WP:COMMONNAME today is simply "Pride". ;; Maddy ♥︎(they/she)♥︎ :: talk  18:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Support LGBT pride instead. SWinxy (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Pride (LGBT+) (with reservations) I believe that Queer Pride, or Pride (Queer) would make more sense in the long run. The reason being that no matter how many letters we add to LGBTQIA+, this discussion will always be evolving. Queer is an independent, inclusive, term that that is not connected to any one sexuality, gender or attraction. As someone who does not identify as LGBT, but does identify as Queer, I feel that the cause of Pride and been bogged down by the lack of a single unifying term. It's nauseating to have to spell and say LGBTQ+ every time in conversation, and since the derogatory connotation behind Queer has been effectively eliminated, this is what feels most progressive to me. But alas, that is just my two cents.
DashJustice (talk) 00:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Queer is still less common per
WP:COMMONNAME, even though it’s also my personal preference. Also, using “queer” as a homophobic/barely re-appropriated term wasn’t that long ago, relatively speaking, and still might be distasteful or “vulgar” (per above) to older readers/users. Dronebogus (talk) 01:17, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Origin of Term Pride Edit Request

I wanted to request a particular edition to the article discussing "Gay Pride" I wanted to ask if it's possible to include the origin of Pride used in 1967 after the Black Cat police raid and subsequent demonstration from 1967 in Los Angeles. The organization formed at the time was called P.R.I.D.E.(Personal Rights in Defense and Education) and thought it would be appropriate to add that to the article since PRIDE is not first encountered at Stonewall. Pzappia (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: That certainly isn't impossible, but that would require
edit requests are designed for editors to explicitly ask other editors to insert or modify material (e.g "please change Mickeal Jackson to Michael Jackson); not a general request to add content to an article. Cheers! —Sirdog (talk) 01:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2023

change “cable TV station” (first paragraph) to “cable TV channel” or “cable TV network”. A station is a physical location that broadcasts, the link goes to an article about a channel (actually a network that exists over different channels in different countries). 2600:1010:B1AC:30E6:C96C:7A1B:A888:9A56 (talk) 01:48, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done M.Bitton (talk) 02:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LGBTI+

Essa é uma das siglas mais aceitas. LGBT não representa toda a diversidade. 2804:214:8629:82D9:1:0:B18E:4895 (talk) 11:57, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pride and Protest

Having a long and proud history of protesting against the powerful, Pride should have some common ground with the like-minded groups. So, instead of taking corporate money, they might have supported the right of groups protesting against powerful people.

Given Just Stop Oil events, would not a section on Pride and Protester be useful and of interest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.196.97 (talk) 07:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]