Talk:Life imprisonment in the United States

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 15 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Kristiedelvalle.

Above undated message substituted from

Maja3141 (talk) 01:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tuck in!Eschoir (talk) 04:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I'll take a break from editing this now, in case someone else wants to take over and do some more editing. The section "Summation" need to be completely removed or integrated elsewhere, as encylcopedic articles dont have summaries - it is this section that makes the article still feel like an "essay". I think that the section "Accidental History" also needs to be taken apart and rewritten, as it isnt about the history of "life imprisonment" - it is about "imprisonment" in general.

talk) 14:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

This is a blog where the author claims to be a friend of Schick's victim: http://daughterofliberty.typepad.com/my_weblog/2008/02/the-killer.html (see some of her earlier posts for more details). She claims that Schick was 29 at the time of the murder, which seems to indicate that he's the Maurice L. Schick who is listed in the Social Security records as being born June 24, 1924 and dying on January 30, 2004 in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. As I don't think there is a federal prison there, he must have eventually gotten out of prison and died a free man. 174.109.20.153 (talk) 02:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been able to locate two independent online sources claiming that the guy got his sentence commuted further by Ford either in 1976 or in 1977 (the 1977 date seems more credible because it comes from an alleged OCR of a contemporary LA Times article.) After half an hour of searching, I failed to locate any lists of Ford's pardons, so I can't confirm either date. The official list on justice.gov only goes back to Bush Sr., and a fairly comprehensive list of presidents' public papers at presidency.ucsb.edu appears to lack many if not most pardons (e.g. it does not include the pardon of Tokyo Rose, which was granted around the same time.) --Itinerant1 (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the history of imprisonment seems accidental. George Bernard Shaw, writing a treatise on Imprisonment as a preface to the report of Lord Olivier on English and American prison conditions, said this about penal imprisonment:

"Nobody invented this. Nobody intended it. Nobody defended it except the people who made money by it. Nobody except the prisoners knew about it. . .It was by mere accident of being picked for sheriff that John Howard learned what the inside of the gaol was like.

As a result of Howard's agitation prisons are now State Prisons: the State accepts full responsibility for the prisoner from the moment of his arrest. So far, so good. But in the meantime imprisonment, instead of being a means of detention, has become not only a punishment, but, for the reasons given at the outset of this essay, the punishment. And official shallowness . . . has made it an infernal punishment. . . ."^[1]

I found this on the page, and it has no background information, one can't tell what it's talking about (what exactly was done on accident? Who is John Howard?) and seems more like somebody spouting their message than it is encyclopedic information. -CB319 68.11.200.74 (talk) 04:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Edit 03:15, 1 July 2012‎ 98.223.133.112 (talk)‎ . . (17,219 bytes) (+1,660)‎ . . (→‎Minors)

The last section of the Minors chapter seems more like unsourced POV, and should be removed. Seems like a very personal defense of life imprisonment of juveniles in the US with wording like "Not all Western and developed countries are faced with the extreme levels of severe juvenile violence the U.S" and "commit truly heinous cases of aggravated first-degree murder- against young children or helpless elderly persons, for example), is unfair- that it might warrant that penalty."

I can't see how this part is Neutral.Jaydee711 (talk) 06:13, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This section appears to be the target of vandalism or activism. The language "without" has repeated been changed to "with" intentionally inverting statistics about the number of inmates serving LWOP sentences. We need to keep an eye on this and try to find which users are committing the changes.John Andrew Ellis (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, doesn't "famous" have a positive connotation? If so, should "famous lifers" be "infamous", or at least "notable" or something?

That's a good question. Famous does have a positive connotation, but I think "infamous lifers" would be a redundancy because all lifers are infamous. "Notable" would have the same connotation as famous, and "popular" would be worse. Perhaps "well known" lifers or maybe just stick with famous? Groupsome (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Life imprisonment in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131018011248/http://www.sentencingproject.org/detail/news.cfm?news_id=1636&id=107 to http://www.sentencingproject.org/detail/news.cfm?news_id=1636&id=107

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"International standards of justice hold that a juvenile life imprisonment without a possibility of parole is not warranted under any circumstances because juvenile offenders lack the experience, education, intelligence and mental development of adults and must be given a reasonable opportunity to obtain release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation"

Can somebody please find the right source for that. The source used only leads to the Graham v. Florida article which doesn't mention that.Bjoh249 (talk) 01:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been revised as part of

Here is my current bibliography with some sources we can use for it.

Subaitar34 (talk) 02:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The U.S. practice of sentencing juveniles to life imprisonment without a possibility of parole violates international standards of justice, as well as treaties to which the U.S. is a party.

• Argumentative
• No sources

Creuzbourg (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Creuzbourg: Several sources are provided in this section, describing these treaties. Jarble (talk) 14:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Although Schick's sentence was given only cursory mention, the court concluded a whole life sentence was constitutional.[10] Schick, together with only five other federal prisoners who were still ineligible for parole at the time, was made eligible for parole by a separate pardon from President Gerald Ford in 1976 or 1977, and he may have died a free man in Palm Beach, Florida, in 2004.

What does this mean? No one knows what happened to Schick? Infinitepeace (talk) 00:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a blog with no relevance, replacing it with a real source:

In 1954, Master Sergeant Maurice L. Schick was convicted by military court-martial of the murder of eight-year-old Susan Rothschild at Camp Zama in Japan.<ref name="Schick">{{cite web|url=http://daughterofliberty.typepad.com/my_weblog/2008/02/the-killer.html|title= Master Sergeant Maurice L. Schick convicted of murder|accessdate=August 8, 2014}}</ref> The soldier admitted the killing stating he had a sudden "uncontrollable urge to kill" and had chosen his victim "just because she was there."

Infinitepeace (talk) 01:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://progressive.org/magazine/the-will-to-kill-in-black-and-white-lueders/

This article states that Schick was released from prison in 1979 after president Gerald Ford commuted his sentence to make him eligible for parole. We can trust this source since presidential commutation records mention a commutation for Maurice Schick by Ford in 1977.

The article should explain what multiple "consecutive" life sentences for a single person mean. It's paradox, and it's not known in many other countries. Who came up with this ridicuolous idea, and why? --Anvilaquarius (talk) 09:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]