Talk:List of International Space Station expeditions

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Space stations Low‑importance United States Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Europe Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Japan Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: Kako River (Japan) A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Canada Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: Technology & engineering / Science & education / History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Do we really need every single "will transfer" notice in this list? I mean, can't we just list the people that are going to be transferred as being assigned to that launch (just move the schedule back a launch)? It makes more sense that way and will cut a lot of redundancy and wasted space. Yaki-gaijin (talk) 03:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I think these words should be removed, but at the same time, I am not very sure what words could replace it better at the moment.

Also, I think the list has to be verified at some point -- the list looks a bit strange with the "Flight up" and "Flight down" being the same spacecraft, but that may just be me. (Never mind that, I didn't notice the docking period of the spacecraft; but still, it can be useful to insert such information.) If it is correct, I think it may require some clarifications. 123.194.150.216 (talk) 14:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rumor has it that under the current plan the final crew is planned to be Expedition 65, which would end in November 2020. But of course the ISS may be extended to past that date.--Craigboy (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we list the Arrival Date rather than the Launch Date? Or both?

The beginning of an Expedition should be when a person arrives at the ISS. For example, the recent launch of a Dragon spacecraft was under control of SpaceX up until the time the spacecraft docked with the ISS. The two astronauts entry into the ISS on the day after launch should be the beginning of their participation with the current Expedition. Also, the ending should be when they leave the ISS, not the landing date. Shouldn't it?

• Seconded. Expedition 1 launched on October 31, 2000 but did not arrive at the ISS until November 2. However, this list says that the Expedition began at launch as opposed to arrival. IJVin (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]