Talk:List of Rick and Morty episodes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Poor Editing

This page is filled with misplaced modifiers and other grammatical problems. It would be good for someone with competent writing and editing skills to heavily edit this page so it's readable. At present, it's pretty embarrassing.

March 10 for chapter 7

Well, the chapter evidently didn't happen, so I guess something needs to be changed here. I would do it but I don't have a clue what happened, or when it will actually be on. --uKER (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Description for Season 1 episode 11

I don't know if this is the official description of the episode and there's been some renamings, or if there's been some kind of mix-up with the versions of Jerry, Rick, and Morty. The Jerry that's being referenced in this description is not of the same "universe" as Rick and Morty. Yet, they still have the same number? (C137) Xaivior13 (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Season 2

The first two episodes of season two have been available on streaming websites and torrents already. How is this possible if they haven't aired yet? Should this be mentioned in the article? 1337cookie (talk) 09:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No need to mention unofficial outlets, pirated, leaked, or otherwise in article. The episodes will officially air as scheduled and that is what we care about. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:34, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Production codes cite

Someone decided to remove the production codes because they did not have citation. The codes for season 1 were posted at https://www.reddit.com/r/rickandmorty/comments/2o7gxj/is_the_production_order_the_real_viewing_order/ by David Weiser, an assistant editor for the show. Note, season 2 production order is the same air date order. Season 1 is juggled a bit, and would have a few continuity issues if viewed in production order. Kid Bugs (talk) 18:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season colors

When possible, I like to make the season colors related to the show in some manner so long as they conform with

re}} 20:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

@
re}} 00:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
The season 3 page doesn't even exist yet. Its just a place holder color until the season actually comes out and we get an image for the infobox. Grapesoda22 (talk) 23:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@
re}} 00:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
@EvergreenFir: What about them? Grapesoda22 (talk) 02:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Separate Section to list shorts, ect in

Given that several shorts and other like material have been released. I propose that a separate section be included to list these, just as is done on the south park episode page here [[1]]XavierGreen (talk) 02:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accessing template for each season.

I see the table for each season is defined by a template whose name begins with a colon, but I don't know how to access it. Anyone care to explain? Thanks in advance. --uKER (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of low ratings for s03e01

This applies to the ratings section. I think we should explain why the season 3 premiere had low ratings. Which is because it was aired without advertising on April Fools Day so no one knew it was going to play. Ansarya (talk) 11:16, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Series overview

"Corporate" sources are irrelevant. As long as any source supports the content, it can be used. Sources state Part 1 and Part 2 for Season 4, and thus it needs to be listed thus. "The Rickshank Rickdemption" was also a deliberate release outside of the rest of Season 3, hence it's separation in the overview, much like Chilling Adventures of Sabrina (TV series)#Episodes (episode 11) and Sense8#Episodes (episodes 13 and 24).

Per

WP:CONSENSUS is formed to keep it. -- /Alex/21 06:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Many seasons have mid seasons break like
Waling Dead, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., among many others have them, no split on the table is shown. Shows like Breaking Bad, Mad Men, and The Sopranos were officially referred to as parts 1 & 2 in their respective seasons. The 4th season hasn’t. No one from adult swim, Warner Bros, Justin Roiland, or Dan Harmon have referred to the season as parts 1 & 2. It’s just a typical mid season break that is common among many shows on network or cable tv.Vinny Weasel (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
No one from adult swim, Warner Bros, Justin Roiland, or Dan Harmon have referred to the season as parts 1 & 2. Do I really need to repeat myself? If secondary sources refer to it as Parts 1 and 2, they can be listed as such, as secondary sources are preferred over primary sources. Educate yourself on Wikipedia's sourcing policy.
You're also lacking an explanation for the Season 3 row. -- /Alex/21 06:54, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Primary sources—get a source from variety, Hollywood reporter, EW, deadline, wrap, that all say that is parts 1 and 2. If no one from the company, creators, or even credible sites say it is then it’s not. Vinny Weasel (talk) 06:57, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What do you base these sites on? What policy allows you to differentiate between one source and another? Do you have a policy that states that the source I provided is not reliable? Or is this all just your own personal opinion? If you don't have a policy, well then... -- /Alex/21 07:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
WP:RSPSOURCESVinny Weasel (talk) 07:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
I linked this source; Inverse is not listed under RSPSOURCES. So: Do you have a policy that states that the source I provided is not reliable? Or is this all just your own personal opinion on what's reliable and not? -- /Alex/21 07:07, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Find a source from that page that supports your claim. If any of those sites that I listed or again from the companies and creators behind the shows say it is, then there, problem solved. Vinny Weasel (talk) 07:11, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why does it need to be from the sites you listed? Do you own this article? The source I provided is reliable and hence can be used. I am not required to feed to your personal whims on what is reliable and not. You cannot support the site I've listed as unreliable; RSP is completely irrelevant here.
And again, secondary sources are preferred over primary sources. Do I need to keep repeating myself to you? Or are you realizing that your argument has no footing? -- /Alex/21 07:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that no other site says that they’re called parts 1 & 2 says something about the issue.Vinny Weasel (talk) 07:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]
Do you want to revise that statement? Or do these not apply to your personal view on what's reliable? -- /Alex/21 07:24, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve never even heard of these websites. No! What’s their history, are they credible sites with a good background. The fact that most of these are so random, is just saddening. You really can’t find a source from the page I linked.Vinny Weasel (talk) 07:32, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So, they have to meet your personal opinion, your personal experiences with websites, and we have to meet your personal demands. Sorry, Wikipedia doesn't work like that. Either accept the fact that the content is reliably sourced, or stop editing the content. You do not own any Wikipedia article or policy, and cannot make your own rules on what's accepted. Self-revert the content, and the sources will be added. -- /Alex/21 07:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It’s not my opinion, if it doesn’t come from credible news outlet then it’s not reliable. Is this confusing you or something? If you’re doing a research paper, would use a credible site like NYT or infowars? Just find something and if not, then move on. Vinny Weasel (talk) 07:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're confused on what's reliable. Just because you haven't heard of it, doesn't mean it's not. I just linked ten creditable sources. Per RSPSOURCES, NYT is acceptable, Infowars is not, and none of the sources I've provided are banned by RSP. Try again?
You have no basis other than
WP:IDONTHEARTHAT, proving you're only here to be disruptive and not actually contribute anything of worth. -- /Alex/21 07:44, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
No you are. What makes these sites reliable, do they have a history of publishing fake news stories and rumors only? There only great because you only saw the headline and immediately thought they were reliable huh? Unless you can prove that these sites are reliable and not some fake news site, then fine. The sources I mentioned are excellent sources when it comes to the industry, they have an credible track record. The ones you mentioned, not so much. Vinny Weasel (talk) 17:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They do not have such a history, no. How do you know they don't have a track record if you've apparently never heard of them? I don't need to prove anything to you. I have proven that the season is referred to as such, and now the onus is on you to prove otherwise. If you cannot, the content will be restored and removal of it will constitute vandalism.
You're also dodging the question about Season 3, and the question on your talk page. -- /Alex/21 01:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You’re the one who’s saying the season is referred to as parts 1 & 2 and if you’re that bad at finding a source from a good reputable place, then you didn’t do a good job. In regards to season 3, there’s already a premiere date listed with a note attach to it, no need to expand on that. And also you started this war now, you refusing to find any reliable sources and just saying there good without any proof from a reputable source is damning. Blaming me is on you, you originally made these edits back in December. Me reverting it back to its original format, and you saying is not is frustrating. You making these outlandish claims with sources coming from obscure websites is on you. You did the same thing Vinny Weasel (talk) 04:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've found plenty of sources from "a good reputable place". Your negative opinion on them is irrelevant, as it's just your personal opinion and nothing else. You have literally zero support against them. The edits have remained since December, over half a year ago, hence they remain the default status quo. The content therefore will be restored and removal of it will constitute vandalism. -- /Alex/21 04:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why don’t we ask some people other people to give their opinion on this? This back and forth between us got us nowhere. I’m sure, there’s other people who would like to express their opinion on this and finally end this debate. Agree or disagree? Let’s see what the consensus is. Vinny Weasel (talk) 05:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If people see this discussion, they're more than welcome to contribute. Until then, the content remains sourced. -- /Alex/21 07:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's all a bit storm-in-a-teacup, but if pushed I'd side with Vinny Weasel. With no "official" statement that season 4 had two parts, it seems to me that the sources provided by Alex 21 are just being a tad lazy in referring to "Part 2" of the season. It's just a continuation following a mid-season gap. Barry Wom (talk) 15:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just a casual wikipedia user. I have to comment that it has annoyed me for months that season four was being listed here as a part 1 and 2. It is just a fourth season with 10 episodes that had a midseason break - Much like The Walking Dead. The season is being sold digitally as just season four. Shows that have two part seasons (The Sopranos, Sex and the City, Entourage etc., Vikings etc.) are officially labelled as this, and usually sold exclusively as "Season x, part 1". The concept of a two part season is usually that they increase the episode count, but film in one block to end up with the equivalent of two seasons out of one years filming. Listing the season three premiere separately is also very odd and should just be noted that they chose a surprise premiere. It is not a separate release in its own right. (SmallHill (talk) 14:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]

episode Summer meets God (Rick meets Evil)

Today I was watching Adult Swim tv channel and on the grid/schedule was a Rick&Morty episode with no info as to which episode it was, so I recorded it and episode apparently titled "Summer meets God (Rick meets Evil)". I don't see it listed at IMDb nor in this Wikipedia article. It is an anime episode and one valid upload of it is at YouTube (uploaded by "ageektheory"), all the other uploads at YouTube I checked were spam (mistitled as Rick & Morty). --EarthFurst (talk) 05:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Episode articles

How is it decided which episodes get their own article and which ones don't? Rattlestar Ricklatica 1.32 million U.S. viewers, and Childrick of Mort 1.22 million U.S. viewers both have articles but Auto Erotic Assimilation 1.94 million U.S. viewers doesn't have an article. (78.19.153.116 (talk) 15:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Editing help

Can anyone help me access the template that's linked by this code? {{:Rick and Morty (season 6)}}? I expected there to be a template by that name (minus the colon) but there's not. Thanks in advance. --uKER (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, table is transcluded from
Rick_and_Morty_(season_6)#Episodes where you can edit it. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 18:33, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Hi there. Thanks for the reply. However, I don't think that's what's being transcluded. In fact, I had just added the final four episodes in the section you linked, yet they don't appear in the table in this article, which is what I'm trying to do now. --uKER (talk) 18:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, ah didn't notice that, working on my end now? Thanks, Indagate (talk) 18:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So it actually is that table and the transclusion just took a while to update? --uKER (talk) 19:15, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, might need a
WP:NULLEDIT. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 19:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Oh, I didn't know about null edits. Go figure. Thanks! --uKER (talk) 19:25, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Audience measurement performed by"

But how is this measurement being performed? I can't find any explanation on the website. I am unsure whether these numbers are representative for online viewership or just cable tv/other views. NeutralerNutzername (talk) 02:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Rick_and_Morty_episodes&oldid=1208288477"