Talk:List of military attachés and war correspondents in World War I

Military history: World War I List‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

List

This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War I task force

Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of military attachés and war correspondents in World War I was copied or moved into List of war correspondents in World War I with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of List of military attachés and war correspondents in World War I was copied or moved into List of military attachés in World War I with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

It's a list (actually two lists), not an article

I moved this article to a new title as a list because, well, that's what it is. Actually it is two lists which should not even be on the same page because military attachés and war correspondents are not the same occupation at all. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 09:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to split Gusfriend (talk) 09:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@BeenAroundAWhile I concur and I added a split template. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is so obvious it should have been done years ago. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the article should be split. K8M8S8 (talk) 20:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.