Talk:List of municipalities in Washington

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Washington High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as High-importance). Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

What good is accomplished by the existence of the

Rainier is a code city, according to the Municipal Reserarch and Services Center and the lady answering the phone at the city. I'm unable to find this documented online though. There was a referendum in 2000 on becoming a code city, which apparantly lost.

Jestapher (talk) 23:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been researching this for days, looking for official confirmation of the status of

List of towns in Washington and adding it to List of cities in Washington]]. Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 09:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

File:ImagesCAU895L8.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:ImagesCAU895L8.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 06:09, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

MRSC

The Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) generally appears to have the most up-to-date listing of cities and towns in the state. The following places are listed as cities there but not by the 2010 U.S. Census:

1. Mattawa, Washington
2. Millwood, Washington
3. Ruston, Washington
4. Tieton, Washington

They all must've become cities relatively recently (within the past few years). —

Other data that's more up-to-date than the 2010 Census includes the place population estimates tables (which don't seem to be completely available in FactFinder, unless I'm missing them), the Census boundary changes, and GNIS data ("Civil" feature type). —

New Full list of cities/towns in 2012 Estimate here --Rossdegenstein (talk) 00:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Updating and click to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014-3.html . New 2014 EStimate. You can edit and thank you. --Rossdegenstein (talk) 01:36, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would think it would be informative and sensible to include a column in this list showing whether each city is a first-class city, a second-class city, a code city, or, in the case of Mattawa, an outlier. The information at this page is suggestive but inadequate/incomplete. --Haruo (talk) 16:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This list from the Municipal Research and Services Center has code/class lists as well as incorporation years. I'll work on integrating both into the list over the next few days. SounderBruce 01:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

List of cities and towns in Alabama (maybe merging the towns list as well). SounderBruce 22:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks, SounderBruce! I think merging the towns list makes very good sense. I'll only be working on this topic, to any great extent, in eowiki, but I will indeed work on it there with the goal of integrating the various kinds of urboj and urbetoj into a single list that shows which class they are. I might even add in the CDPs, neighborhoods, and other inhabited-place toponyms. --Haruo (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merging CDPs and other unincorporated entities might be a bit too much. Towns at least are defined under the Revised Code of Washington alongside cities, and there's precedence with other state lists. SounderBruce 22:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This struck me as irrelevant minutia that detracted from the article, almost to the point where I deleted it. What value do you see in having this information here? It seems of no interest to anyone, save perhaps a lawyer who specializes in such details. 130.44.142.234 (talk) 11:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to the combined city-town lists for

I certainly have no objections; it seems like it should be much more helpful than troublesome for typical users. Whoever they are. --Haruo (talk) 02:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About 750 total between the two lists isn't too shabby. SounderBruce 04:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on these lists, trying to bring them all up to featured list status (including 2 of the 3 you mentioned!). I was planning on doing these mergers for any state that divided it's incorporated divisions into multiple pages (where reasonable). I'm also doing the reverse and creating new pages for non-incorporated places (CPDs) or the lists would be way too long. I support this merger. Mattximus (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to lend you a hand in getting this list up to featured status, as it has been on my mental to-do list for quite a while. SounderBruce 23:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that sounds great. What do you think about the format I chose for

Montana? I know the data from 2010 is a bit out of date, but I still prefer using actual counts over estimates. I also used templates so that the census in 3 years will be able to be inputted quickly and accurately, bringing the whole list up to date. If you like this format, I'll set it up and we have have a go. Mattximus (talk) 13:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

What do you think of this plan?

A map of municipalities could be made using Census data. As for the list format, I think it looks good, but I would use a colspan for the Population to save a bit of width. Also, I believe that using estimates would be a better indicator of population than 16-year-old census data, since Washington state and her cities are growing at a

very fast rate (especially Seattle and her suburbs between 2010 and now). SounderBruce 04:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Colspan sounds good, I can incorporate that into the list. Now I agree that that statistics from 2010 are 6 years out of date, however there are a few problems with using estimates. First, estimates are not really considered "encyclopedic" and will likely not pass at featured list review. The tradition there is to use the latest census or official registrar data (it's just unfortunate the USA only collects once every 10 years). In a few years the data will be up to date. The 2000 data is just to show longer term trends in population growth. It wouldn't be very informative to include change over a year or two, since that goes up and down all the time. Second, the program I wrote that automatically pulls from the United States Census page can only pull from official censuses, the formatting of the estimates is different (for some reason) and it messes up the pull. If we did choose estimates, it would have to be done by hand, which would take hours and hours... What are your thoughts? Just as an example, this morning I tested out the bot on List of municipalities in Wyoming, it made the table in seconds. Mattximus (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rankings in the city images captions do not match the table. For instance Everett is seventh in the 2019 estimates, not sixth. I wonder if including the rank in the caption is more trouble than it is worth, given probably annual changes in the list. - Bri.public (talk) 21:58, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the rankings are based on the census data? We really shouldn't be including 2019 estimates anyway, and stick with census counts. New one coming in a few months! Mattximus (talk) 22:04, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with SounderBruce but for another reason: when updating from the census, the municipalities are listed alphabetically, and so updating this list becomes a headache if listed by population. Also, their original reasoning, that it can be sorted with a click, is also reason enough not to rearrange. On a side note, it would be great to merge the two tables into one to make the sorting more comprehensive. Mattximus (talk) 01:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]