Talk:List of phylogenetics software

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of phylogenetics software article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unnecessary link in "External links" section

"Another list of evolutionary genetics software", http://research.amnh.org/users/koloko/softlinks/ does not add any information over other "External Links". It can be deleted. Varthy (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

wrong link in Treefinder

the link goes to "treefinder.de" anouncing xenophobic/rassistic stuff. Please change it to http://www.treefinder.de/downloads.html thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abernmauke (talk • contribs) 10:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of phylogenetics software. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719171139/http://bioweb.pasteur.fr/seqanal/phylogeny/intro-uk.html to http://bioweb.pasteur.fr/seqanal/phylogeny/intro-uk.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

License of the softwares

Could it be a good idea to add a license column? - Arteteco (talk) 08:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced table entries

There are many entries in the table with no sources and no evidence of notability. I am proposing to weed these out unless another editor can provide compelling reasons for retention. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]