Talk:List of seafood companies

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Food and drink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia
to learn how to do this.

Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,

select here

.

Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are

transcluded

from the project's tasks pages.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Inclusion in Category:Seafood companies

This article is in Category:Seafood companies, but that is a container category and so should only contain categories, not individual articles. However given the obvious fit of the article to the category I have started a discussion at Category talk:Seafood companies as to whether its container status needs to change, which I thought I would flag up here given the connection to this article. Dunarc (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (

Calidum 18:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

List of seafood companies → List of fishing companies – Google hits for "fishing company" at 1.3m are ~20% more common that for "seafood company"at 1.1m. And per my argument at the Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_8#Category:Seafood_companies, it seems that fishing industry/company is synonymous with seafood industry/company. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Apples and Oranges. Seafood is a type of food (a product), while Fishing is an activity, so any comparison via searches is at best meaningless. I suspect there are thousands of “companies” that engage in the activity of commercial and sport fishing. Seafood on the other hand as a type of food is not only obtained via fishing, but aquaculture and hand harvesting as well. Commercial oyster beds and massive mussel farms are not considered “fishing”. There is no “fishing” involved in the propagation, growth and harvesting of large offshore aquaculture farms producing salmon and other species for the seafood market. The companies listed are large commercial “seafood” (product) companies, not exclusively “fishing” (activity) companies. Such a name change would subject this list to the inclusion of 100s of commercial and sport fishing companies while eliminating any seafood company involved only in aquaculture. Mike Cline (talk) 14:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mike Cline. Fishing is an activity, seafood is a product. These companies are differentiated by their product, not their activity. Many do not engage in fishing or primary production at all, but merely in food processing and marketing. Walrasiad (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Walrasiad that some of these entries are indeed not engaged in the collection, but only down-stream (ha!) operations. I added my oppose to the CFD on this basis as well. DMacks (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.