Talk:List of windmills in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 18:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

merge all 3 separate one-state-only lists back in

I propose to merge List of windmills in Illinois, List of windmills in New York, and List of windmills in Rhode Island back into List of windmills in the United States. The split is not required by size. Note the U.S.-wide list has only 13,786 bytes, while a very old rule of thumb is that a split is justified by size if an article has grown over 100,000 (or was it 200,000?). When recombined, all locations in the U.S. having coordinates will show in just one linked OpenSourceMap map. This will serve readers better. (Note this came up in discussion at Talk:List of museum ships). --Doncram (talk,contribs) 17:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging User:Mjroots, User:Djflem, User:Swampyank, User:CaptJayRuffins as editors of one or more of these pages. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 17:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I suggest that the first column should be the windmill names, as "Windmills", then the second column should be "Location", which naturally includes coordinates. Instead of "Location" and then "Name of mill / and coordinates". And use "Image" rather than "Photograph", allowing for drawings or other types of images. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 17:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Anticipating this merger will be acceptable, and eager to see the now-active map of all coordinates in OSM, i went ahead and copied in the 3 tables and two sources (which can be removed if merger not agreed). If merger is agreed upon, it remains to redirect the 3 list-articles (leaving categories in place) and to remove "{{further|List of windmills in Illinois}}", "{{further|List of windmills in New York}}", "{{further|List of windmills in Rhode Island}}". --Doncram (talk,contribs) 19:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Before I can think of expanding the list, I’ve been finding that it has grown exponentially since I created it to find my way around the ‘eleven’ smock mills on the east end. Now I have 21, and mock mills that have history of their own. While I can see that my descriptions and columns are outdated, and coming to know them by name, it’s time to do an update. I am just not convinced it would be workable. With over 300 on Long Island, adding Cape Cod, Rhode Is, Conn and Nova Scotia is a massive undertaking. I just did Orient Point on the north fork, +4. Left out the tide mill/windmill in Mattituck. Still researching the Glen Island one advertised when it first opened. Three on Manhattan, one of those was either inside Fort George or outside. Help, I’m overwhelmed by petticoats… CaptJayRuffins (talk) 00:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Review needed: Draft:Orient Windmills, NY CaptJayRuffins (talk) 00:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Petticoats? There is some expression about fog and petticoats that I don't recall right now. That is about
Draft:Orient Windmills, NY, which is meant to be a separate article? I am so glad you are back and on the job! Offhand I like all material about windmills, whether historical or replica... A review is asked for there, when perhaps you mean to "submit" it within the Articles For Creation process? --Doncram (talk,contribs) 09:39, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The 8 sided 'SMOCK' mills were also called 'Petticoat mills' as they resembled the dress & also work coverings called a smock. Hope that helps... CaptJayRuffins (talk) 13:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Byte size is not the only consideration. There is also the physical length that these lists reach to consider. This is the reason that 20 entries was decided on as the threshold for a stand alone list. Mjroots (talk) 06:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I didn't anticipate any disagreement actually. Let's not get all territorial (pun?) and do let's work together to improve the List of windmills system of articles, which overall is a great thing. I do appreciate, very much, the work of all editors in the past on these. I just now re-removed the copies of Illinois, New York, and Rhode Island tables from here, which i had gone ahead and copied in, in order to avoid any confusion about where information about New York windmills should be edited, etc. (And I see that CaptJayRuffins has just made edits in the separate List of windmills in New York, as well as making some edits in the (non-duplicated) New Jersey section of this U.S.-wide list.)
One thing in passing: these are supposed to be lists of Windmills, not lists of "Locations". And, maybe more so in the United States than elsewhere that Mjroots has written about, individual windmills all have names. So the "windmill" should be the first column, and "location" second. And coordinates are part of location, they are not part of a windmill's name.
The fact that the New York windmills are legitimate or whatever, is besides the point, IMHO. I myself don't see any problem, readability-wise, for the reader to read and enjoy the New York material as part of the U.S. wide list. Being "way long enough for stand-alone" is not a reason, IMHO, to separate out the New York table, when in my opinion it is better for it to appear in the nation-wide list. It is not a matter of "prestige" (my air-quote) for New York or anything like that. The "supremacy" (my air-quote) in fact of New York's windmills is made clear when they are included in the U.S.-wide list, and the linked OSM map (as it was before I just re-removed the IL, NY and RI material, anyhow) shows the great concentration in New York, and specifically in Long Island, and specifically in the eastern end of Long Island, relative to the very few scattered other examples nation-wide. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 09:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Check out current linked OSM map, which informs the reader, incorrectly, that windmills in the U.S. are few (both because many windmills so far lack coordinates, and also because at least 4 states' ones are left out), and more in the center of the country than anywhere else. I am thinking about a way to MacGiver a linked map which draws on coordinates in separate list-articles, which would address the problem. The possibility I'm thinking hasn't been done in mainspace Wikipedia before, AFAIK.
But, really, duh on all of us for not noticing, even with my statements about all the windmills being in New York, which should have jarred someone knowledgeable (which obviously i am not). --Doncram (talk,contribs) 17:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Names of windmills, location info, other formatting

I've gone through this page, putting "Windmill" or "Mill" as first column title, and using proper noun names where available. Where a proper noun name is not available I put in just "Windmill" or an expression that is descriptive such as "Windmill at Robert M. Lamp Cottage". I mean not to appear to be coining new names in Wikipedia's voice; I mean for readers to be aware that "Windmill" is not the proper noun name of a local mill and I hope they will replace that with a more specific one.

And I have been putting location info such as "Minneapo State Park" (and I would put in a specific street address if available as those seem useful to me), and city or town names, and coordinates, all in one "Location" column. It is fairly easy to find exact coordinates for still-existing windmills in Google Satellite View, because windmills look pretty different than other objects. I obtained coordinates for many that way, and also I accepted (often without checking) coordinates from linked articles.

Did that in New York list also, and expect to do similar editing in Illinois, Rhode Island, Massachusetts' separate lists.

Am open to feedback, alternative suggestions.

And i posted similarly at List of windmills, but with question about proper noun names of mills in other nations being less widely available. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 22:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

source on windmills in Maine

Does an editor have the source cited for a property in Castine, Maine:

  • Lombardo, Donald (2003). Windmills of New England, Their Genius, Madness, History & Future. Cape Cod, MA: On Cape Publications. ISBN 0-9719547-7-1.

I am not sure if that windmill is the one at 12 Madockarondo Rd., which I just added as a separate item. And, does that source have more specifics, such as addresses, etc., to add to other windmill items in ME, NH, VT, CT, RI? --Doncram (talk,contribs) 23:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]