Talk:Litchfieldite

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance Talk:Litchfieldite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is no doubt that these rocks were affected by the metamorphism and this is the origin of some unique features present in litchfieldite: subsolvus paragenesis of feldspar, gnaissic and foliation, orientation of the nepheline optical axis, and so on. In some occurrence there was a certain grade of anatexis and the production of real igneous anatetic pgmatite, like in Canaã massif (Brazil).

I indicate in this case to adopt the same formula that was used to describe "Charnockite":

Zimbres 15:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Litchfieldite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924021711/http://www.geologi.no/images/njg/1975-1979/1979/1/NGT_59_1_001-023.pdf to http://www.geologi.no/images/njg/1975-1979/1979/1/NGT_59_1_001-023.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]