Talk:Loe de Jong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Historian, not a journalist

As far as we know De Jong was not a journalist. He wrote from a scientific attitude, a historical one to be exactly. His major work was written (long) after the actual happening. B.t.w. he was in London when his subject of writing was going on on the continent. So: i suggest to change his cats etc into history, not journalism. -DePiep 11:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Loe de Jong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"German aggression against Poland"

Is NPOV and also historically false, given the prehistory to the German invasion of Poland. I realize that this is a problem for those with a vested interest in a useful from of historiography. 105.0.6.104 (talk) 13:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]