Talk:Long hundred

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Numbers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles defunct .MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

Time Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Hundred (unit) page were merged into Long hundred on 17 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Vago, Mike (December 7, 2020). "Here are a few of Wikipedia's most surprisingly controversial topics". The A.V. Club.

Sometimes the value of 100 was referred to as a small hundred the larger value being the long hundred or the great hundred.

The second half of that sentence seems grammatically incorrect. Also, it doesn't seem to make sense. I'm referring to: "the larger value being the long hundred or the great hundred."

There is no identification of "the larger value" until later in the article. Also, I would think there should be a comma or semicolon before that part of the sentence.

Please correct this section.

SLATE 15:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the wording slightly. Count Truthstein (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The word "thousand" has been used to refer to the number 1200 (see http://www.sizes.com/units/thousand.htm). The article would benefit from a discussion of this too, and the meanings of the words "hundred" and "thousand" in different languages. Count Truthstein (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A six-score hundred (120), appears to be common germanic, and not confined to the English. Since 'thousand' derives from 'ten hundred', it follows that the thousand is also 1200. The translators of the gothic bible felt obliged to state that the hundred is teentywise (ie in measures of five score).

Gordon "Introduction to Old Norse", Oxford, 1927, gives in section 107, the numerals, for '120', is given hundrað, for '200', hundrað ok átta tigir (hundred and eighty), and for 240, 'tvai hundrað'.

R E Zupko, "A Dictionary of Weoghts and Measures for the British Isles", gives under "wey". .. But the weigh of Essex cheese .. is 300 li. (pounds) weight, at the rate of five score and xii li. to the hundred, which is 336. l. (1430). The conversion period was when one might need to quote the hundred.

A long hundred was for counting things with heads, eg people, nails, cattle.

The long hundred of six score was displaced with the arrival of christianity, in the goths, by the english, and by the norse. It is the outer folk, for where writing arrived before christianity, that the best records for the six score hundred is attested.

Note that despite duodecimalists, this has nothing to do with 12. There was no corresponding measure of 12 surviving, for example.

--Wendy.krieger (talk) 11:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The usage of

It would be nice if there was a table of names and values for non-decimal numbers used, either in this article or referenced by this article. Kevink707 (talk) 00:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This word article is missing coverage on Hundred (county division), which is also a word, so at the least, there should be a paragraph with a {{main}} attached -- 65.94.78.70 (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]