Talk:Lucy Koh

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Elmer-DeWitt, Philip (2012-12-23). "Apple v. Samsung: Who's been editing the judge's Wikipedia entry?". Fortune.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110604153141/http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2010/01/29_koh.nomination.html to http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/2010/01/29_koh.nomination.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100206222505/https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-nominates-five-serve-united-states-district-court-bench to http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/president-obama-nominates-five-serve-united-states-district-court-bench
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://gov.ca.gov/press-release/8613/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Helo @Snickers2686

I see you changed the profile picture for Lucy Koh. I believe the original picture was a better picture then the new one. Are you sure the new picture is better? I did not put the picture on her page, but looking at it independently, I'm not sure the second picture improves the page. What do you think? 

MIAJudges (talk) 04:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MIAJudges: How is this not an improvement since this is an updated photo? The other one is seven years old. Snickers2686 (talk) 04:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ Snickers2686

The new picture doesn’t come out as clear as the original picture. When I clicked on the picture I actually thought something had happened to my computer screen. I went back to the old picture & it looks crystal clear. I didn’t see anything wrong with the original picture at all personally. Plus the older picture seems more professional.

MIAJudges (talk) 05:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What effect does a professional picture have on the article? Snickers2686 (talk) 17:07, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Snickers2686

I posted an updated picture for another nominee earlier this year & was told a newer picture does not replace a better quality older picture. I was also told I had to gain consensus if there was a dispute to change the picture & it was reverted back to the original. Plus as I said the second picture does not seem to have as good of quality as the original. Now I am not trying to take that route, just asking if you could take a look at the original picture & if you do not see anything wrong with it, perhaps we can just stick with that picture. I would be more than happy to add the picture you posted in her article if you like under the newer section for her being a circuit court nominee so both pictures can be on her page. What do you think about that?

MIAJudges (talk) 04:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]