User talk:MIAJudges

Hi there, are you considering putting full references instead of bare ones. It would help the project. Thanks, Egeymi (talk) 15:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I usually just create pages & don't always use bare urls but I will try to going forward. I have created & improved several pages but feel free to improve any you see that need it.

Wally Adeyemo... Gilles Bissonnette... Jeffrey Bryan... Andrew Manuel Crespo... Justin Driver... Mario García (judge)... Rochelle Mercedes Garza... Amparo Monique Guerra... Deepak Gupta (attorney)... Shammara Henderson... Jacy J. Hurst... Leah Litman... Nico Martinez... Merritt McAlister... Camille McMullen... Lee Merritt... Melissa Murray (academic)... Jennifer Nou... Elizabeth Prelogar... Ajmel Quereshi... John Rappaport... Allison Riggs... Cristina M. Rodríguez...

All of the Obama, Trump & Biden district court judges have pictures. Here are the active GW Bush judges that do not have pictures.

Clay Daniel Land, Jay Christopher Zainey, Christopher Charles Conner, David Charles Godbey, Jose E. Martinez, James Edgar Kinkeade, Alia Moses,Thomas Alexander Varlan, Philip Peter Simon, Louise Wood Flanagan, Earl Leroy Yeakel III, Robert David Proctor, Ronald Allen White, Marcia Ann Cain Crone, Kenneth Michael Karas, Paul Steven Diamond, Jane Ellen Jackson Boyle, Robert Bryan Harwell, Timothy Carroll Batten Sr., Thomas Edward Johnston, Aida Milagros Delgado-Colón, Susan Davis Wigenton, Renee Marie Bumb, Thomas Lamson Ludington, Gregory Kent Frizzell, Robert James Jonker, Timothy D. DeGiusti, William Lindsay Osteen Jr., Martin Karl Reidinger, Sharion Marie Aycock, Robert Michael Dow Jr., Joseph Normand Laplante, Thomas David Schroeder, James Randal Hall, Mark Steven Davis, Paul G. Gardephe, Glenn Thomas Suddaby, Cathy Seibel, Eric Franklin Melgren

MIAJudges (talk) 22:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If people are pinging you after you've asked them to stop, you can mute them at Preferences>Notifications. Valereee (talk) 14:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Oh yea I know. I just can’t bring myself to actually use the mute button for adults. I know I should but I can’t bring myself to do it. They are sad but that’s the world we live in. It is what it is but I will not lower myself or my standards because of them.

MIAJudges (talk) 14:14, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have filed an SPI here involving yourself. Please view it here [[1]] Let'srun (talk) 13:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The link is at Site ban for MIA Judges Valereee (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really not going to respond to that? It's a community-imposed indefinite site ban, MIAJ. That means not being able to edit anywhere except your talk page, and there only to work on an appeal. Valereee (talk) 10:14, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good morning. I have been responding for over two weeks. I truly am tired of it to be honest. I’ve now got one Wikipedia user going on an outside blog taunting me. I’m an adult & really don’t have time for childish games. I only come on Wikipedia to look up nominees for federal judges & since that has basically stopped there’s not really a need for me to come on here much if at all. I don’t come on here for almost any other reason & it’s just not fun anymore to tell you the truth.

Yesterday was a really good day for me. I got a promotion at my job I have been working towards for two months now. I have so much more going on in life than going back & fourth with some of these other Wikipedia users. Thankfully I have a good life. When I don’t enjoy something, I stop or eliminate it from my life. I have barely logged on to Wikipedia in the past week or so unless I got pinged or an email from the site. I appreciate the heads up but I have said all I have to say. I really appreciate it though. You are a good & fair user. Wikipedia would gain from more users like yourself.

Thank you very much

MIAJudges (talk) 12:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, congrats on the promotion, at any rate! Valereee (talk) 14:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Much appreciated

MIAJudges (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for multiple reasons, including falsifying sources and off-wiki canvassing and harassment, detailed in the community ban discussion at Special:Permalink/1166253595#Site ban for MIA Judges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Thryduulf (talk) 10:36, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

adress the issues then submit the article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sundeep Addy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 05:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MIAJudges! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 05:00, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gilles Bissonnette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk to me! • contribs 14:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MIAJudges. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 21:23, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject might meet GNG but the article does not demonstrate this. Further concerns about NPOV writing in a BLP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Merritt McAlister and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 15:35, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Alexandra Schimmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Schimmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BD2412 T 20:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajmel Quereshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajmel Quereshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Snickers2686 (talk) 22:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, MIAJudges. It has been over six months since you last edited the

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]