Talk:MS Hans Hedtoft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconShips
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articlesWikiProject icon
WikiProject iconShipwrecks
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

  • Lady Elizabeth (1879)
    • Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
    • Improve grammar
    • Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
    • Discuss desired additions -None

the jinx of the "unsinkable" ship

'Dit schip kan niet zinken!' "Het is gemaakt van ijzer, Sir - ik verzeker u, het kan."98.67.187.186 (talk) 06:52, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inquest

Was there no inquest? - wloveral — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.105.203.119 (talk) 11:50, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They didn't have any survivors and no traces at all of the wreck (a lifebelt washed ashore in the Faroes a couple of months later), while it was clear from the distress calls that the ship had indeed struck an iceberg. Not much material for an inquest there. 195.67.149.173 (talk) 10:32, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A ship that took four hours to sink should have given crew and passengers plenty of time to take to the lifeboats. And by 1959 lifeboats would have had emergency radios. It says that conditions were the worst seen. Is it known what the conditions were? Was there a storm that could have swamped the lifeboats, or just heavy fog? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.137.134.50 (talk) 17:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MS Hans Hedtoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MS Hans Hedtoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsinkable?

The claim that ship was regarded as unsinkable is almost impossible to credit given the history of that claim as applied to another ship. The claim sounds sensationalist and the source does not strike me as reliable. Per

WP:REDFLAG this really needs to be better sourced. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

That's an official gov't site. Removing tag.50.111.34.214 (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's a municipal website that does not indicate any source for the claim. I have also been unable to find any corroborating evidence. If the claim is accurate there should be some evidence, somewhere else, that predates the sinking. I remain highly dubious about this claim which sounds suspiciously like it was invented to add some kind of connection to the Titanic. If this is the only source, it's not enough for that kind of claim. Again, see WP:REDFLAG. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's backed up at least in part by the previous Time reference, which states it was "the safest afloat". Mjroots (talk) 06:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's not the same as "unsinkable." -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MS_Hans_Hedtoft&oldid=1213138187"