Talk:Mafia state

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ThisisnotDavid1154.

Above undated message substituted from

talk) 00:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eholland50. Peer reviewers: Jgalloway310.

Above undated message substituted from

talk) 00:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Any other sources?

All the sources are western media coverages. Furthermore, no mention of Yeltsin, even though everything began under him--96.250.107.241 (talk) 04:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand the sources, the specific term "mafia state" is used when referring to the Putin era, "in which officials [many of whom FSB], oligarchs and organised crime are bound together to create a 'virtual mafia state'", which is distinct from the Yeltsin era, although the Russian mafia of course also existed back then and although Yeltsin's government wasn't perfect either. By non-western, I suppose you mean Russian sources. Free/independent media in Russia are routinely harrassed and journalists even killed in some cases, and a state-controlled Russian source wouldn't be a reliable source for anything else than the position of the Russian government/the Putin regime in this particular case. In any case, here is a Russian source too: Moscow Times Tataral (talk) 02:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeltsin's government wasn't perfect either? Maybe Yeltsin's government wasn't government? "Free/independent media in Russia are routinely harrassed and journalists even killed in some cases" ... look at the statistics, you'll see journalist murders under Yeltsin weren't less, though many were not registered and there were less journalists that time. Please, if your emotions drive you, respect emotions of other peoples, or maybe let's drop off paranoia at all? The article needs to be rewritten to make understand mafia state is primarily an INSULT for any country, as it has neither legal status nor scientific definition, along with empires of evil and so on.--213.208.170.194 (talk) 11:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't YOU find all of the appropriate information (such as about previous Russian government regime also being a "mafia state", or at least being a "founding father" of this definition) with an appropriate (reliable and neutral) sources to back that information up and then add all of that to this article, instead of simply complaining about "insults" and "paranoia" (you forgot to add in another mandatory word that is often used in such discussions - "
Rndomuser (talk) 02:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The USA was classified as a pseudo-democratic plutocratic Oligarchy, we should mention the USA in the articles Oligarchy and Plutocracy.--95.115.96.108 (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wider meaning of the term and global perspective

I've tried to describe the wider meaning of the term, but the article still needs expansion and more global perspective. The way how the original version tried to present the subject term was rather inappropriate. GreyHood Talk 22:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking about something like this (edit summary), I mist tell that it is about Russia, and it is about any other states that have been described in multiple
WP:RS as "Mafia states". My very best wishes (talk) 13:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
I wonder if we can rm the tag now? Objections? Ukrained2012 (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Ukrained2012 (talk) 03:45, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To whomever person that is trying to vandalize this and other articles using TeliaSonera IP ranges

Please stop. You tried to vandalize this (and other articles) using IP ranges such as 90.236.xxx.xx [1] and 95.199.xxx.xx [2]. Your edits were reversed. Now it looks like you're trying to do this using new range 95.195.2xx.xx [3], as well as 95.199.xx.xxx [4], belonging to same exact ISP... Which again was reversed. Not to mention VERY similar "strange" (the editor tries to revert his own edits several times in rapid succession) edits by now-banned user Peterzor, in this same exact article... I don't know who you are or why are you doing this - but please stop. This is not helpful to anyone. If you have obsessive-compulsive or any other mental disorder - please find another outlet for it, other than Wikipedia itself. Thank you for understanding. 173.68.110.16 (talk) 22:39, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transnistria

The text on Transnistria is unreferenced, and the term "new underrecognized territory" might not apply. First, we cover these as States with limited recognition, second it seceded in 1990 and is not that "new" any more. Dimadick (talk) 19:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted. Ukrained2012 (talk) 21:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Oh, and I'm fascinated with your username) Ukrained2012 (talk) 22:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Ukraine can also be classified as a Mafia State, especially under Leonid Kuchma.--95.115.96.108 (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wp:overcat and a irrelevant picture

Here we go again. Some unregistered users just couldn't bear the controversy around article's topic. Something they should to keep to themselves(. Instead of blocking article's legitimate development (currently, with pictures (!). Happy edits, Ukrained2012 (talk) 16:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

per wp:overcat the newly added categories by Ukrained2012 should be removed and that folk festival picture is irrelvant 90.129.90.1 (talk) 07:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, anything in this article may be removed after either reaching consensus (in this case, at least with me) or by administrator intervention on BLP cases (which is not what your
reckless edits were about). Me objecting turns your repetetive "shoulds" into "mays". That's why I suggest you explain how the pic showing Yakuza
public displays of pride on a government-overseen event could possibly be irrelevant here.
AS for the
WP:OVERCAT
, that guideline clearly allows for "common sense", "exceptions" and consensus. For starters, please cite subsec of OVERCAT that you refer to)
Oh, and please stop reverting, at least until you get your own account. Anons are not in position for revert-warring. Wishes, Ukrained2012 (talk) 12:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About your

policy. With only one comment here by the IP editor, this cannot be said to have been "thoroughly discussed." Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]


I'm on the IP's side on this one. The categories added aren't relevant. The concept of a mafia state transcends individual states so its not really appropriate to include it in specific country's categories. If we look at the other articles in the "Authoritarian and totalitarian forms of government" template for consistency, they no specific country categories included.
The picture I'm not as averse to; its not "wrong" it just feels misplaced. The portion of the article about the Japan and the Yakuza is a bit thin; if it were expanded the picture might feel a bit more at the home. But at the minute it is sort of like "what has the Yakuza taking part in folk festivals got to do with mafia states?"
--Rushton2010 (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No substantial counterarguments have been presented to me so far. I'm, however, willing to explain my point even more popularly) So, reference to

WP:OVERCAT
is erroneous as it doesn't apply (see above and the guideline itself), and wasn't elaborated since.

As for the picture, its relevance is obvious, especially with caption which I added (and which text I'm willing to discuss further). It illustrates how the Yakuza (the mafia) is deeply entrenched and comfortable in the public life of Japan (the state) which has been characterized as mafia state. Do you read me so far, gentlemen? Are my sentences short enough for you?

I'd be glad to see someone suggesting better pic demonstrating similar thing. Unfortunately, the only goal of my bulldozeuos IP "opponent" is to purge these particular pictures and cats( And, quite possibly, to prevent further development of a sore-topic article;)

Oh, and the rant about "section being too thin for a picture" is very mature, helpful and reasonable too( Why don't you

make that section thicker NOW
?

Happy edits, Ukrained2012 (talk) 23:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like discussion is booming here(. The crusading anonymous user is probably;) busy editing other articles. What a circus have the lazy admins allowed to happen... Ukrained2012 (talk) 02:17, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whether a user is anon user or a registered user, or a long term or one off user, their views are just as valuable. Its the whole point of wikipedia -its open to be edited by anyone. --Rushton2010 (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Should the image of Putin be in this article

There is a clear consensus, that the Putin image should be removed from the article. Armbrust The Homunculus 13:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

FSB
Chief Nikolay Patrushev at a government meeting. The term mafia state is frequently used in relation to both the Putin regime in general and the FSB misconduct particularly.

I am going to start this RfC because I see above that not only the sockpuppets of Chaosname have concerns here. Thus we should see what others think that have not edited the article. The image has been here for some time but thats not a reason to keep if others see a problem. So should we display an image of Putin and FSB Chief Nikolay Patrushev as the primary and thus far only visual representation the article has? -- Moxy (talk) 21:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The USA was classified as a pseudo-democratic plutocratic Oligarchy and we have no images of American Oligarchs like George Soros in the article Plutocracy.--95.115.96.108 (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

  • Support inclusion. Seems well-sourced and illustrative. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Against inclusion. My initial thought is that it does not represent a world view of the subject. I've studied Russian politics and I've seen reputable British scholarship uses the term "mafia state". There is consensus among scholars that power in Russia has become (and is increasingly becoming) centralised, but there is disagreement about whether this is part of increasing democracy/accountability or a move back towards Russia's tradition of autocracy. The article itself is certainly out of date with how it describes Russian politics and there are a few things in it that have made me wince. The power of Oligarchs, for example, has been significantly curtailed, with the informal circles around Putin now holding the power. Corruption and inefficiency were widespread among the regional governments, but through the centralisation, their power has again been significant reduced; although the inefficiency is endemic (many say worse because of the centralisation). My fear is that this is not a world view and that political bias comes into it. When I studied Cuba, for example, I was struck with how different American scholarship was to the rest of the world. Many US sources would portray the US as a saint and I was quite shocked at how supposedly reputable sources could be so politicised. I think the Euro news said it right "Russia is considered in some circles to be a virtual mafia state" -some circles. The caption of the picture says "frequently"; something completely uncited - I'll change it.
    Now to the photo and the caption itself. The second half of the caption is uncited. "frequently used"? there is nothing in the article to back that up. "the FSB misconduct particularly" -again there is nothing in the article to back that up. Then there is the question, why a photo of Putin? Is there nothing else that could embody the mafia state or mafia in russia? I read an interesting article not long ago about how, through the centralisation of power, Putin was attempting to remove power from the corrupt, mafia like regional government, the leaders of which they called "barons". In that view Putin could be seen as attempting to reduce any form of mafia state. Again; there's no agreement about where Russia is heading (or the nature of political power currently for that matter).
    Common Sense: Just choose something not controversial. I think really, if we approach this issue on common sense grounds, this photo has caused a great number of issues and has had repeated attempts at removal. At the end of the day, as the sources state, Russia is only sometimes called a Mafia State, so, -common sense- wouldn't we be better to select a photo that is not controversial, and which is not going to spurn constant attempts at removal, and constant and pointless talk-page debates? Did we all join wikipedia to get involved in pointless surveys and constant debate? Let's not waste our painfully short lives. Let's have a non-controversial photo or no photo at all and save a whole load of pointless and counterproductive talk-page battles. --Rushton2010 (talk) 03:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Against inclusion It does not represent a world view and it is pointlessly controversial. WP does not exist to make judgements about the governments of countries. Martin Hogbin (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't care, so take it out. This article needs a lot of work, and the picture of Putin is just a distraction. Take it out, improve the article, and then argue about what pictures should be included.--Wikimedes (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Threaded discussion

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Addition of the UK to the corruption by country list.

Shouldn't we include the United Kingdom in the political corruption by nations section and site the numerous sources that have highlighted the problem of lobbying and paying for political influence in the UK, we even make and air tv shows about this but it's not mentioned on wikipedias mafia state page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.250.186 (talk) 16:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Every state was and is partially a mafia state ...

I think it is not necessary to explain why. But you forget to mention an important state with undisputable global imperial ambitions, known also as "Plutocracy" where this term was coined by its own citizens (by the way financial experts). I agree that it is not wise to use this term for its description, but let us wait a bit, what the history will say after its collapse. Important Personal Statement: "I officially disagree with my opinions" Note: you are welcome to erase this paragraph - it should be a problem of your conscience, whereas you probably do not have any ? Best regards, (do not think ! do not speak !! do not write !!! do not sign !!!! - and if your signed, do not be surprised ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.111.58.115 (talk) 00:44, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The USA was classified as a pseudo-democratic plutocratic Oligarchy.--95.115.96.108 (talk) 18:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico

What about Mexico the Organized crime has a strong political influence in this country.--95.115.96.108 (talk) 18:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgaria, Ukraine and other countries?

Bulgaria, Ukraine and other States were also described as Mafia States.--141.19.228.15 (talk) 09:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Especially Ukraine. Zezen (talk) 03:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

USA

The Intelligence Agencies of the USA cooperated with American and foreign Criminal Organizations and were involved in the illegal Drug trade, so we can call the USA which are often described as an pseudo-democratic plutocratic Oligarchy a Mafia state too.--141.19.228.15 (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mafia state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rv, why

Can the IP editor kindly stop adding Donald Trump to this article, it is patently absurd. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How does Croatia not make it on here? Western geopolitical Bias?

I'm very surprised that Kosovo and Transnistria have made their way into this article but not Croatia. Croatia has been it's inception (definitely since Tudjman) a cronyist, ultracorrupt mafia regime ran by a coagulate of business, criminal syndicates and fascist groups, and which uses ultranationalists and fascistoids to deal with any intrastate threats to it's authority, continually left off the radar (In my little talkpage WP:POVPUSH) due to Western bias because it's a strategic NATO ally in the contested Balkan region (even though it does not pass NATO and EU membership criteria).


An independent judiciary and law enforcement agency does not even exist in Croatia. It's economy has been feasted upon almost exclusively on a cross-section of organised criminal activity and neo-fascist union buster/corrupt police types. It's one of the biggest offenders in sex slavery, human trafficking, illegal weapons trafficking and organ trafficking in all of Europe. Sasha Radovic was immediately arrested once he tried running for elections in 2011, and he was a former military high-end and anti-corruption activist. Both the military General, most of the prime ministers and other high profile political and business figures stand repeatedly accused of war-profiting, war crimes, money laundering, collusion and impunity. In example, Neofascist war criminal with pining for Croatia's Nazi collaboration days Branimir Glavas was jailed in 2008 for war crimes but was allowed (while in prison) to be named as the head of the ultranationalist HDSSB in it's run for the 2011 elections after a commission by Branko Hrvatkin, president of the supreme court. He was suddenly released in 2015 for vague reasons despite committing crimes that usually warrant execution or a life sentence, and immediately went on a threatening rampage on journalists and judges who covered and were involved in his trial, and witnesses in his trial with shock pictures of dead bodies and hangings.


As you can see clearly demonstrated here, the Croat fascisto-mafia tribalism that runs that god-forsaken chunk of the Balkans is well established to both current and historical observers, and I think it deserves a significant spot on this article. I'm not trying to be an apologist for Russia or anything, not at all, I just think that the article should include countries accused of the label which are Western allies. 118.211.84.50 (talk) 07:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Ta for the summary. Poland is approachin this state as of 2018. Zezen (talk) 03:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

United States edit war

Since the edit war over the inclusion of the United States under Trump, other sources besides Masha Gessen have sprung up:

Deepred6502 (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The United States under Reagan were also a Mafia State (

Irangate).--37.24.7.146 (talk) 06:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Israel

I think we should add Israel here as well, based on the points described in an article below:

Bálint Magyar

I happened accross this quote today:

ISBN 978-0-593-33224-5
.

This contradicts this article's claim that the term was coined by Alexander Litvinenko. Litvinenko died in 2006, while Magyar used the term in 2013 book, so Litvinenko was almost certainly first. I'm not familiar with this topic, and it may be that Litvinenko and Magyar were using the same term for different concepts. In any case, it seems to be worth adding Magyar's conceptualization to this article. Daask (talk) 16:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mafia_state&oldid=1214206017"