Talk:Martinique macaw
Martinique macaw has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 2, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Orphaned references in Martinique macaw
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Martinique macaw's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Woods":
- From )
- From )
- From ISBN 0-8493-2001-1.)
{{cite book}}
:|editor=
has generic name (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help
Reference named "Olson":
- From Saint Croix macaw: Olson, Storrs L. (2008). "New evidence of Ara autochthones from an archeological site in Puerto Rico: a valid species of West Indian macaw of unknown geographical origin (Aves: Psittacidae)" (pdf). Caribbean Journal of Science. 44 (2): 215–222.)
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help - From Cuban macaw: Olson, S. L.; Maíz López, E. J. (2008). "New evidence of Ara autochthones from an archaeological site in Puerto Rico: a valid species of West Indian macaw of unknown geographical origin (Aves: Psittacidae)" (pdf). Caribbean Journal of Science. 44 (2): 215–222.
- From Lesser Antillean macaw: Olson, S. L.; E. J. Maíz López (2008). "New evidence of Ara autochthones from an archeological site in Puerto Rico: a valid species of West Indian macaw of unknown geographical origin (Aves: Psittacidae)" (pdf). Caribbean Journal of Science. 44 (2): 215–222.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:25, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Martinique macaw/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 10:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- I propose to review this article and will start doing so shortly. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
First reading
As usual, a competent, well-written article. Some points, mostly on the prose:
- Wikilink extinct, endemic,
- "... actually blue-and-yellow macaws (Ara ararauna). Ara erythrura, another blue and yellow macaw ..." - It is unsatisfactory ending the first sentence with a scientific name and starting the next with another one. The full stop in between is difficult to detect.
- "The Martinique amazon (Amazona martinicana) of the same island, was described under similar circumstances." - Can you explain this a bit more fully?
- "A 1626 painting by Roelant Savery shows a blue and yellow macaw alongside a dodo, which is different from the mainland bird in having yellow undertail covert feathers instead of blue, but its origin is unknown." - This sentence is a bit confusing, both as to whether the macaw or the dodo is being referred to and as to what is being described as unknown?
- "It is considered the same as the Martinique macaw today, if either has ever existed." - Its not clear what "It" refers to in this sentence.
- "... on these islands mention distinct, endemic species, ..." - Perhaps "refer to" would be better.
- "... they could have been escaped individuals ..." - Does this "they" refer to the "historical records" mentioned earlier in the sentence?
- "As many as thirteen extinct macaws have at times been suggested to have lived on the islands until recently." - This sentence is confusing.
- "Cuban macaw" - needs a scientific name.
- What are "subfossils"?
- That's all for now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Second reading
Thepoints i raised above have been resolved. Reading through the article again I saw:
- "It is unlikely that it will ever be known what Bouton actually saw." - This might be better phrased as "Exactly what Boulton was describing is likely to remain a mystery".
- "Ara erythrura is considered the same as the Martinique macaw today, if either has ever existed." - How about "If either bird ever existed, Ara erythrura is likely to be identical to the Martinique macaw.
- On my screen, the text is pinched between the dodo image and the tazobox, and the single word "description" appears below the dodo image as the only part of the text not sandwiched between the two. You might consider moving the dodo image.
- Not to me, we may have set different thumbnail/text size settings, or different screen types...
- The caption "Unidentified parrot supposedly from Jamaica, which may be this bird" could state "Martinique macaw" rather than "this bird".
-
- Nearly there. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
GA criteria
- The article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose and grammar, structure and layout.
- The article uses many reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. I do not believe it contains original research.
- The article covers the main aspects of the subject and remains focussed.
- The article is neutral.
- The article is stable.
- The images are relevant and have suitable captions, and are either in the public domain or properly licensed.
- Final assessment - I believe this article reaches the GA criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:18, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Martinique macaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140207182726/http://www.auburn.edu/~willi71/carib_parrot.pdf to http://www.auburn.edu/~willi71/carib_parrot.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002000642/http://www.petermaas.nl/extinct/speciesinfo/martiniquemacaw.htm to http://www.petermaas.nl/extinct/speciesinfo/martiniquemacaw.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)