Talk:Mary Ann Cotton

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as High-importance). Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. North East England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've reverted to remove material that appears to be a copyright violation from this website. Brendan Moody 08:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the last section of this article is an almost verbatim lift from 'Horrible Histories: The Vile Victorians'... (79.68.80.116 (talk) 23:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

My God, who wrote this article? Somebody who doesn't speak English? I just edited the article, it was full of spelling and punctuation errors, words missing, half sentences and the like.

It also has a couple of sentences which are confusing but I feel too tired to research this now ... This article needs more cleaning up! Regards, 61.17.205.209 20:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Still full of holes and solecisms. Have tided up to death of husband no4; then new characters are introduced by surname and without description. Much more work needed. One of the names of the husbands was wrong, too... --Cunningham 12:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have updated with info from contemporary reports. Now looking a bit more respectable --Cunningham 14:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Under Husband 1, she has 5 children, 4 of whom die, and then 3 more, all of whom die. This should add up to 8 children, 7 dead, 1 living. In the next section, however, there's a reference to 1 of her 2 children dying, and that she had 9 in total. This needs fixed. Sleepsong 02:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed a few issues, but no time to go back and fix. Will try tomorrow.

1) "defence" should be "defense"; (or is "defence" old English?)

2) there is a period inserted where there should not be one some ways down the page. It breaks up a sentence that shouldn't be broken.

3). FOR DISCUSSION PLEASE: I'm aware that "gaol" is old English for "jail" but "gaol" is used at the end of this article whereas the rest of the article uses modern day English. Should the modern day spelling, therefore, be used for consistency since it doesn't appear it is being used as a quote? 68.28.147.112 (talk) 01:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "old English"? "Defence" and "gaol" are perfectly good modern British English. ("Gaol" is a little dated, but "defence" is entirely current.) Marnanel (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The lead says "She chiefly used arsenic poisoning ...". But the article makes no suggestion that she used any other method. Did her trial reveal, or perhaps just suggest, any other methods? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding to this article as an assignment to add a theoretical explanation to this woman's behavior. Ckuil (talk) 14:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think we may need to make it clear where the use of the term "Black Widow" type of murder, as you have used it here, originates, to avoid confusion with the existing Wikipedia article

WP:RS. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

That’s my nanny 2A00:23C6:9113:3D01:8DF1:F996:CB99:DC04 (talk) 19:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]