Talk:Mary Decker

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group. project's importance scale. To-do list: edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

	Olympics Mid‑importance
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Athletics Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

United States Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

There is no mention in this article of the Moscow Incident in 1974, during which Decker threw a baton at a Russian. I don't have much information on it. Could an editor please add it in?

Mary Decker did not run 2:26 for 1000m ever and certainly not when she was running 2:01.8 perhaps 2:36 but I did not know where to look for this info.

CoachDale 74.123.230.98 20:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The current women's record for the 1,000 meters is: 1000 meters 2:28.98 Svetlana Masterkova (Russia) 23Aug96 Brussels —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.249.209.109 (talk) 03:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not fair or accurate to portray the Budd-Decker incident as being Budd's fault. If you look at it on youtube you can see clearly that Budd did not know what she was doing. I have also heard her saying in interview that she could not see Decker. If you look at the incident the problem is more about Decker being unable to deal with being in that tight spot - which she later admitted - than Budd's actions. To start portraying Budd as the villain of the piece is pretty biased and very much slanted in the american woman's favour. These type of incidents happen all the time in track. To be quite honest, Decker's behaviour was pretty poor, crying like a spoilt child on the side, publicly blaming Budd after the race and never apologising. Bad sportsmanship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.198.119 (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read about

talk) 13:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

that quote is biased and it is being included? Fair enough I won't put in youtube, tho I thought anyone interested in the race would find it useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.76.41 (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Read the second pillar here -

talk) 13:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

The long quotation should be edited out or at least cropped. It's blatantly biased and aiming to convince readers that Budd was the guilty one. Paper sports journalism in general is often about creating heroes and villains, catering to what the readers are supposed to wish to hear, plus it's often very charged with emotions and wishful thinking, and so it should be very cautiously used as a source of knowledge. I saw that race and while they qere close, Budd was clearly not forcing Decker out to the rail or unduly impeding her running. / Strausszek (talk) 13:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that race too... and live at the time. There was much tension leading up to it, and specifically between Budd and Decker. This was perhaps Ms. Decker's signature length, or at least one of them, and a chance to finally win an Olympic Gold in it. During the race, and with the resultant fall, I was startled, not knowing precisely what to make of Decker's claim. The covering network however then scanned around, to different camera angles, and -- though I do not know if the film exists anymore -- but one angle seemed to incontrovertibly support Decker's initial claim of a trip. (It was more of a 'straight-on' view, with the athletes running toward the camera: an unusual perspective.) I therefore support the Wiki article as it presently stands. (John G. Lewis (talk) 19:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC))[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:34, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Long Reuters article, just published --

Sports Reference reports she was born in Flemington, New Jersey. Bunnvale red links and doesn't even show within the country, no mention. I don't know New Jersey. Does this place exist? Is there a hospital for her to be born in there? Would Flemington be more accurate? Trackinfo (talk) 10:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see this subject was opened above with no resolution.

I placed the dubious marker next to the 2:26.7 time for 1000 meters. Granted this is old and has been repeated many times by other sources but, lets look at some facts: Decker was a 2:02+ 800 metres runner at the time. To run an extra 200 metres in 24 seconds? The mark does not show up in the IAAF youth bests, no marks for the event do. I have not found actual race results. Lets get an actual newspaper account from the day. Many of Deckers records were set indoors on Imperial tracks. Most of her 800 marks were converted from 880 yards. 1000 yards would be much more likely a distance to have run and practical to have run in 2:26.7 at her level of the time. Trackinfo (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the section on the 1984 Olympics Incident is the phrase "Decker stood on Budd...". I don't know too much about this incident, but this seems such an odd wording choice. One does not "stand on" things while running. Certainly "stepped on" would make more sense, and a more detailed description (e.g., something like "Decker's right foot hit Budd's left calf") would be even better. If someone more familiar with this incident could at least change "stood" to something more accurate, that would be awesome. Cheers! Doctormatt (talk) 20:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that "stood on" doesn't seem to make sense. I wasn't able to find a running term by that name, and since no one has objected to your request, I have removed the term altogether.Chillowack (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]