Talk:Meritorious Unit Citation
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The correct name for the waterway is the
- It really doesn't matter what the 'correct term' in other senses may be - in this article, and in this particular citation, the correct term is as per the quoted reference - there is no need to continually revert it back to "Arabian", or to add [sic], as there is simply no error in grammar or spelling involved - just the use of an alternative term. PalawanOz 09:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Inherrited Citations?
Any Idea what happens when a warship(or Squadron, regiment etc) with the same name as one who previously earned a MUC is commissioned? Does it inherit the Citation as it would a battle honour? AlexanderFrancis (talk) 10:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meritorious Unit Citation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120326054931/http://www.gg.gov.au/res/file/2011/honours/qb11/Media%20Notes%20MUC%20%28final%29.pdf to http://www.gg.gov.au/res/file/2011/honours/qb11/Media%20Notes%20MUC%20%28final%29.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)