Talk:Michel Drucker

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles France Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Journalism

THREE people editing my shitty little article a few minutes after it has been created... you really have no life! :-) (and some way of knowing when an article has been created).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.112.103.77 (talk) 22:43, 29 April 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Easy. Many people on Wikipedia have a look sometimes on Recent Changes just to check if some people wrote something interesting on something they're interested in... or if people are vandalizing pages. David.Monniaux 22:50, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Great! BTW, please do not replace correct and in this case first-hand information, even if badly formulated, with incorrect and watered-down reformulations. Michel has been voted the most popular host at least a few times, including the time when I read the results. And the anecdote thing is wrong in the new form by David. This is not "a joke" by Michel. Again, I watched the show where he told the story.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.112.103.77 (talk) 23:01, 29 April 2004 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that your first-hand information was a bit outlandish and said in a jokingly manner. People will tend to water down information that is not attributed nor properly qualified, and seems to express some exaggeration or personal bias. David.Monniaux 06:36, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Why is there not a comma after the CQ. I think there should be and if there is, can somebody add it there? Robert (talk) 04:07, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michel Drucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101115131712/http://www.ina.fr/divertissement/showbiz-et-people/dossier/1959/champs-elysees.20090331.I00009901.non.fr.html to http://www.ina.fr/divertissement/showbiz-et-people/dossier/1959/champs-elysees.20090331.I00009901.non.fr.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121114074351/http://vivementdimanche.france2.fr/?page=vivement-dimanche to http://vivementdimanche.france2.fr/?page=vivement-dimanche

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]