Talk:Mitch Clem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Untitled

Created a an article about him

Fuhrmann suckz

He Has His Own Wiki Check It Out [1] --Halokiller27 17:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

This page should be merged with

San Antonio Rock City. The article is to small as it is. Barely two lines long. Debaser23 11:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

I completely agree. One step ahead of you buddy. -Switch t 12:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article has grown quite a bit now, although it is still relatively small. I would encourage anyone else to add to the article.--Zinman13 19:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wow your right the article has grown considerably since I last viewed it but more people need to expand on it. Debaser23 19:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe SARC should be merged, but NN2S should not. It is notable of its own accord. Thatcrazycommie 18:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Thatcrazycommie. SARC should be rolled in. I think that NN2S is notable of it's own accord, and am on the fence about rolling it in. None of his comics are published very regularly any more, but he still is a constant presence, so I could see rolling those two entries into this one. WalkerHamilton 13:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN2S is too notable of a comic strip in the web comic world and the punk community to not have its own page. SARC could be merged, but as it continues to grow, it may have to get separated again, so why not just leave it separated now? Ghost mouse 00:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Better to merge it now than have someone delete it later. -Switch t 12:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
While
Nothing Nice To Say the comic is notable, the article itself it pretty much just a cast listing. It could easily be a sub-category within Mitch Clem for the length that it is. it gets a yes to merging from me. SARC also. Willeth 10:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
I agree. I mean, how hard is it to turn them into redirects to the appropriate sections?--
Grimboy 19:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Photo

So has anyone made a serious attempt at getting a photo we can use in the article? If there isn't a free one someone can find, I think someone could just ask his permission to use one of the many on the intarnets. There's a whole bunch out there that I've seen, and I don't see why he'd withhold his permission. Qwerty0 (talk) 19:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What Mitch has to say about this article...

...can be read here. I just removed that squirrel-story and am wondering which versions were by him. --NoCultureIcons (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my stupid afterlife

The most recent My Stupid Life, dated May 28, 2009, has a big THE END in the last panel. Would it be premature to say that it's over? —Tamfang (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mitch Clem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Mitch Clem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]