Talk:Moser (glass company)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Czech Republic Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Glass Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This copyvio tag has been improperly applied because no source page has been indicated, but I found one page from which a portion has been taken. This is a well known long established glass making company. I have edited the temp page to briong it back to a stub that is non-copyvio.

Yes, the page is equal to the text on "moserusa.com" site. I am sorry, I havent knew how this copyvio template works. What does it mean "to put the temp page in place"? If there has been placed a copyvio, it si better that steward will delete these revisions.--

talk) 21:40, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The copyright infringement has been deleted and stored at Moser Glass/deleted revisions 2008-12-19. Noting here in case of future administrative need. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks.--

talk) 09:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm not sure why my additions, made a few days ago, do not show on the history page with my tag (though they are in the current article itself), and so I wanted to add this note. (Karpaten1 (talk) 11:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

The article history quite clearly shows 4 edits on Dec 22, so I don't know what you are looking at. ww2censor (talk) 15:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following quote, from the third paragraph of the History section of the article, is incomprehensible, at the two places I've marked in bold:

Following the death of his father in 1916, Leo Moser took over the direction and the company expanded significantly resulting in their recognition by a Grand Prize award of the at the Paris International Exhibition of Decorative Art in 1925. They also exhibited in London, Belgium, Italy and Vienna. The depression of the early 1930s exacted its toll, reducing its staff to 240, eventually Leo resigned from the company in 1932. Later, having sold their shares in the company in 1938.

1. Is there some text missing after award of the and before at the Paris International Exhibition, or is the text of the simply redundant?
2. The second sentence has clearly been cut short, and needs to be either restored or removed.

However, I have no suitable references to help me effect the necessary changes, without perhaps losing some relevant information. yoyo (talk) 12:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed: well spotted yoyo. ww2censor (talk) 13:18, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]