Talk:Movement (clockwork)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Watches This article is within the scope of WikiProject Watches, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of watches on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WatchesWikipedia:WikiProject WatchesTemplate:WikiProject WatchesWatches articles Time Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I always thought the movement didn't include the indicating part of the timepiece, the face and hands. --Chetvorno^TALK 06:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Movement (clockwork). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090728200824/http://hiro.alliancehorlogere.com:80/en/Under_the_Loupe/Calibres_by_Make to http://hiro.alliancehorlogere.com/en/Under_the_Loupe/Calibres_by_Make

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

• Uhrwerk einer Taschenuhr.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:06, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is it worth going to the trouble of mentioning that besides "Caliber" companies also commonly used "Grade" (American watch companies like Hamilton) and less commonly "Reference" (Like Cyma Tavannes)? I'm happy to add it I just don't know if it should be added. I think it should but, I'm sometimes a weirdo about minutia so, I can't trust my judgement on this kind of thing.

Mad Bunny (talk) 05:29, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]