Talk:Neofelis

Indonesia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neofelis#Distribution_of_species uses the term "clouded leopard" to refer to the entire genus, to both species at once. Do experts ever do this? Chrisrus (talk) 05:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. For example, "Based on this reclassification of clouded leopards not only species, but also the populations on Borneo and Sumatra should be managed separately and a higher priority should be placed to protect the different populations from extinction." in

doi:10.1186/1742-9994-4-15. Ucucha (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

I see. So the reason this article is an exception to the

WP:COMMONNAME guideline seems to be the fact that Clouded leopard is already occupied? Also, by the way, don't you think the "distribution of species" section is a bit far down in the article for it to mention the term "clouded leopard" for the first time? Especially given the fact that this is an article about clouded leopards, you'd think the article would use the term in the lead. Also, what in Latin would you call a Neofelis species, a neofelid, as with "Canis/Canid"? Chrisrus (talk) 13:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

"A species of Neofelis, I would think. "Canid" refers to the family Canidae, not the genus Canis.

The situation here is messy because "clouded leopard" is a plausible name both for the genus and for the species Neofelis nebulosa. The situation with the

common chimpanzee

. Unfortunately, the sources so far seem to simply use "clouded leopard" for N. nebulosa.

This article certainly needs some work; there's no need for the first paragraph of the lead to discuss ancient taxonomy in such detail, and as you say it should mention the term "clouded leopard" a bit earlier. Ucucha (talk) 13:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion going on about the redirect

neofelid you might want to comment on. About this article, how about a hatnote to the other clouded leopard articles? Chrisrus (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

The term Neofelis is indeed a term used in taxonomy, though I don't consider it ancient. And think that the lead section is the right place to explain, when and by whom it has been used for the first time, and what it means. The internal links provided in the lead section direct to the respective articles about the clouded leopards of mainland Asia and Sundaland. So why a hatnote if these links already exist and are correct? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not talking just about the term "Neofelis", but the species that were originally included in the genus in the early 19th century are now indeed ancient taxonomy that's only of historical interest. If that fact should be discussed at all, it should be in a section on taxonomy, just like in featured articles like ring-tailed lemur. Ucucha (talk) 15:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To address your last question: because some disambiguation seems to be in order, and the simplest way might be some kind of a hatnote. This article seems to be clouded leopard (genus) and the other clouded leopard (species). Chrisrus (talk) 15:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no genus called clouded leopard ! The genus is called Neofelis ! And comprises 2 species ! Is it the use of Latin that makes you so confused ? Or what else is unclear for you ? -- BhagyaMani (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The common name "clouded leopard" is used for the genus Neofelis as well as the species Neofelis nebulosa. Ucucha (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is not completely correct, Ucucha. At least not in regards to scientific literature, as it would cause misunderstanding, whether genus or species is meant. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@BhagyaMani, Neofelis#Distribution_of_species uses the term "clouded leopards" to refer to the entire genus, to both species at once. Chrisrus (talk) 16:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When using the words "clouded leopards" before the list, I do not refer to the entire genus, but to species. Read the list again: the felids mentioned there were described BEFORE the term Neofelis came into use. So they were not described as Neofelis species, but subordinated under the genus Felis at the time of description. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence could synonymously read "Between 1821 and 1862, several clouded leopard species have been described from Southeast Asia..." or "Between 1821 and 1862, several Neofelis species have been described from Southeast Asia..." Anything Neofelis is a clouded leopard and vice versa, right? It's like Crows refers any and all species in that genus, is it not? Chrisrus (talk) 16:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, with your last edit, you have eliminated the only usage of the term "clouded leopard" from the text. If it weren't for the picture captions, a reader wouldn't know that we are talking about clouded leopards at all. Please agree in the abstract that the fact that they are called "clouded leopards" is one of the most important things we should tell the reader about the referent of this article. Chrisrus (talk) 17:57, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I started out to edit it just a little but I ended up re-arranging and so on quite a bit. Thank you Bhagya for basically all the content, which along with most of the words I have tried to preserve. Chrisrus (talk) 04:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Section Break

Ok. It looks like we have no better choice in this case than to ignore

The Sunda clouded leopard does NOT live in Thailand, but the clouded leopard does. It's confusing and unhelpful from a encyclopedia standpoint to add Neofelis to the category Mammals of Thailand. Strictly speaking, Neofelis is NOT an animal of Thailand, since it's only a genus and not a single species.

I suggest that it's best to put only clouded leopard in that category.

Kortoso (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why I used the name "

Neofelis diardi

See this. Leo1pard (talk) 07:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

Leo1pard (talk) 18:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Neofelis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120406173758/http://lynx.uio.no/lynx/catsgportal/cat-website/catfolk/nebul01.htm to http://lynx.uio.no/lynx/catsgportal/cat-website/catfolk/nebul01.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

my change was reverted without discussion. would you care to justify your opinion, or is this just a case of "because I said so" ? NeuralWarp (talk) 00:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The website in your ref is not reliable; several similar websites published similar statements in past years. But to date, Taiwanese wildlife / forest department staff did NOT officially confirm that the sighted animal was indeed a clouded leopard. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How big is it? Drsruli (talk) 06:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are two different species; their sizes are given at the relevant articles, so I don't think there's a need to repeat them here. Anaxial (talk) 06:24, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But there's a description here, too. (It's described in the other articles as well.) If there's a comparison to be made, then this would be the place for it. Drsruli (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]